Page 108 - Mechatronics for Safety, Security and Dependability in a New Era
P. 108

Ch19-I044963.fm  Page 92  Tuesday, August 1, 2006  2:54 PM
            Ch19-I044963.fm
               92 92  Page 92  Tuesday, August  1, 2006  2:54 PM

                                                                                    u
               operation  UOiv as shown in Fig.5(d). Action 2 is to release  segment \L  and to grasp segment iL\  as
                                                                                  u
               shown in Fig.5(e)  for operation  UOi or for operation  UOi V. Action 3 is to grasp  segment L i  keeping
               segment \L  grasped  for  operation  UOi as shown  in Fig.5(f).  Anyway,  we have to change  grasping
               points  for the  last transition  from  state  S5 to  state  Si i. Consequently,  in the  above plans to  perform
               sequence  SQj,  N c=\  and  it is minimum.  We can  also derive the minimum  N c for  sequence  SQ2 and
               sequence  SQ3. The  former  is  N c=2 and the latter  is  N c=\.  This implies that sequence  SQ2 should  be
               eliminated  from  adequate manipulation  plans. Thus, we can narrow  down candidates of manipulation
               plans  by  considering  N t  and  N c.  After  that,  quantitative  analysis  (Wakamatsu  2004)  should  be
               performed  in  order  to  check  whether  a  selected  manipulation  can  be  realized  practically  or  not
               considering physical properties of a linear object  such as rigidity. Thus, we conclude that our proposed
               method  is useful  for planning of knotting/unknotting  manipulation  of deformable  linear objects.


               CONCLUSIONS

               A planning method  for knotting/unknotting  manipulation  of deformable  linear objects was proposed.
               First, knotting/unknotting processes of a linear object were represented as a sequence of finite  crossing
               state transitions. Next, grasping points and their moving direction to perform  each state transition were
               defined.  Then, possible qualitative  manipulation  plans  can  be generated  by a computer  system  when
               the  initial  state and the objective  state of a linear object  are given. Finally, criteria  for  evaluation  of
               generated manipulation plans were introduced. By considering them, we can narrow  down candidates
               of manipulation plans.


               REFERENCES
               Hopcroft  J.E., Kearney J.K.,  and Krafft  D.B. (1991). A Case  Study  of Flexible  Object  Manipulation.
               Int. J. of Robotics Research, 10:1, 41-50.

               Inoue H. and Inaba M. (1984). Hand-eye  Coordination  in Rope Handling,  Robotics  Research:  The
               First International Symposium, MIT Press,  163—174.

               Matsuno T., Fukuda T., and Arai F. (2001). Flexible Rope Manipulation  by Dual Manipulator  System
               Using Vision Sensor,  Proc.  of International  Conference on Advanced  Intelligent  Mechatronics,  677—
               682.

               Morita  T.,  Takamatsu  J.,  Ogawara  K.,  Kimura  H.,  and  Tkeuchi  K.  (2003).  Knot  Planning  from
               Observation, Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, 3887-3892.

               Wakamatsu  H.,  and  Hirai  S.  (2004).  Static  Modeling  of  Linear  Object  Deformation  based  on
               Differential  Geometry, Int. J. of Robotics Research, 23:3, 293—311.
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113