Page 328 - Mechatronics for Safety, Security and Dependability in a New Era
P. 328

Ch63-I044963.fm  Page 312  Thursday, July 27, 2006  12:08 PM
            Ch63-I044963.fm
               312
               312    Page 312  Thursday, July 27, 2006  12:08 PM
               station  increases,  we increased  the placement  density  of the base  stations.  Installation  area  for  the  six
                                                                2
               base  stations  was  changed  from  (a) 15x20  [m]  (0.02  station  per  in ),  which  was  the  case  described
                                            2
               above,  to  (b)7x7[m](0.12  station  per m ).  As  a  result,  RMS_  error  decreased  to  1.3[m]  as  shown  in
               Figure 3.
                   1 W                                  i  ^
                                                                            :Base stations
                           #5       #4            #:
                                     H            E                       g  : actual position
                                                                           •  : calculated position
                 —-5--
                   3
                                                        3
                                                        1
                                                   3                           13      i.
                   1
                        (a)  15X20  [m](0.02[/m])              (b)7X7[m](0.12[/m])

                            Figure 3: Calculated  position  and density of base station  installation

               In  order  to  compensate  for  the  influence  of  human  body  on propagation  loss measurement,  a  second
               mobile station was attached  on the wearer's back in addition to the one on the front.  First, the positions
               of the two mobile  units  were  calculated  independently,  and then the middle point  of the two positions
               was adopted as the worker's position. Incorporating  this compensation method,  in area (a), RMS_error
               was reduced to 2.3[m]. In area (b), RMS_error was reduced to  1.2[m].


               CONCLUSIONS

               1) Positioning  system  based  on  pseudo  distance  derived  from  propagation  loss  of  Bluetooth  wireless
               technology has been proposed and evaluated. 2) Attaching mobile units on the front  and the back of the
               human body compensated  for the error caused by absorption  by human body. RMS-error  wad  reduced
               from  3.4[m] to  1.3[m] by this compensation method. 3) RMS_error was reduced  from  3.4[m] to 2.3[m]
               by  increasing  the  placement  density  of  the  base  stations.  4)  Overall  RMS-error  was  1.2[m]  by
               incorporating two compensation methods.



               REFERENCES
               Fall,  K.  and  Varadhan,  K.  (2001).  The  ns  Manual,  The  VINT  Project,  A  Collaboration  between
               researchers at UC Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and Xerox PARC, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.

               Hightower  J., Bordello  G. and  Want  R.  SpotON  (2000): An Indoor  3D  Location  Sensing  Technology
               Based on RF Signal Strength.  UWCSE  Technical Report  #2000-02-02.

               Kitasuka  T.,  Nakanishi  T.  and  Fukuda  A.  (2003)  Location  Estimation  System  Using  Multi-Hop
               Wireless Network. Journal  of  Information Processing Society of Japan, 44:SIG10.

               Priyantha  N.B.,  Chakraborty  A.  and  Balakrishnan  H.  (2000).  The  cricket  location-support  system.
               Proceedings ofMOBICOM2000,  32-43.

               Want  R.  et.  al..  (1992). Active  Badge  Location  System. ACM  Transactions on Information  Systems,
               10:1,91-102.
   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333