Page 130 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

5. MEDIA PRIMING 119

Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude
change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty
(Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford Press.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (1997). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a
transactive model. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 20 (pp. 185–225). Bev-
erly Hills, CA: Sage.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Arpan-Ralstin, L. A., & St. Pierre, J. (in press). The quick and the
strong: Implications of attitude accessibility for persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau
(Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992a). The accessibility of source likability as a
determinant of persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 19–25.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992b). On the orienting value of attitudes: Atti-
tude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198–211.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). The role of belief accessibility in attitude
formation. Southern Communication Journal, 62, 107–116.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Klinger, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (in press). Media priming.
In J. B. Bryant & R. A. Carveth (Eds.), Meta-analysis of media effects. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schachter, S., & Singer, S. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of the
emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.
Schleuder, J. D., White, A. V., & Cameron, G. T. (1993). Priming effects of television news
bumpers and teasers on attention and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic
Media, 37, 437–452.
Segrin, C., & Nabi, R. L. (in press). Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expecta-
tions about marriage? Journal of Communication.
Shrum, L.J. (1999). The relationship of television viewing with attitude strength and
extremity: Implications for the cultivation effect. Media Psychology, 1, 3–26.
Shrum, L. J., & O’Guinn, T. C. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social
reality. Communication Research, 20, 436–471.
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of
information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some impli-
cations for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 38, 841–856.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and
probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
vanDijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
vanDijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Acad-
emic Press.
Wilson, S. G., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P., Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental
models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications. Journal of Memory and Lan-
guage, 32, 141–154.
Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process
model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134.
Witte, K. (1995). Generating effective risk messages: How scary should your risk commu-
nication be? In B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Communication Yearbook 18 (pp. 229–254). Thou-
sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wyer, R. S., Jr., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Gorman, T. F. (1985). Cognitive mediators of reac-
tions to rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 324–338.