Page 276 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

9. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION EFFECTS 265

Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., Jr., & Grant, A. E. (Eds.). (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives
on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Reeves, B., Thorson, E., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Attention to television: Psychological the-
ories and chronometric measures. In J. Bryant & Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media
effects (pp. 251–279). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (2000). Public communication campaigns (3rd ed.) Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Richardson, G. W., Jr. (1998). Building a better ad watch: Talking patterns to the American
voter. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3, 76–95.
Roberts, D. F. (2000). Media and youth: Access, exposure and privatization. Journal of
Adolescent Health, 27S, 8–14.
Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news. Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage.
Rosen, J. (1999). What are journalists for? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rubin, R. (1976). Party dynamics: The Democratic coalition and the politics of change. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston: South
End Press.
Sabato, L. (1987). Real and imagined corruption in campaign financing. In J. Reichley
(Ed.), Election American style (pp. 155–179). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. Cambridge, MA: Har-
vard University Press.
Schudson, M. (1999). Good citizens and bad history: Today’s political ideals in historical per-
spective. Murfreesboro, TN: John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence, First Amendment
Studies, College of Mass Communication, Middle Tennessee State University.
Sears, D. O., & Chaffee, S. H. (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of
empirical studies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates, 1976: Ford vs. Carter
(pp. 223–261). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Shah, D. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individ-
ual level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19, 469–496.
Shah, D. V. (2001). The collision of convictions: Value framing and value judgments. In
R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (Eds.), Communication in U.S. elections (pp. 55–74). Lanham,
MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). “To thine own self be true”: Values,
framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509–561.
Shah, D. V, Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with
civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Com-
munication, 8, 141–162.
Shah, D. V., Kwak, N. & Schmierbach, M. (2000, November). Digital media in America:
Practices, preferences and policy implications. Final report produced for the Digital
Media Forum/Ford Foundation.
Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S. H. (2001). Communication, context, and commu-
nity: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication
Research, 28, 464–506.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Mayfield, E. K. (1987). Building a theory of news content. Journalism
Monographs, 103, 1–36.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass
media content, (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Sigel, R. (1965). Assumptions about the learning of political values. The Annals of the
American Academy, 361, 1–9.
Sirianni, C. J., & Friedland, L. A. (2001). Civic innovation in America: Community, empower-