Page 74 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research
P. 74

3. GROWING UP WITH TELEVISION                                  63

        work audience share will continue to shrivel (despite the occasional
        blockbuster series) and be divided among an ever-increasing number
        of competing channels. Developments such as interactive TV that will
        allow advertisers to reach finely targeted groups—and even  individual
        viewers—will be vigorously pursued.
           Yet, all this is being accompanied by massive and unprecedented con-
        centrations of ownership of media industries and program sources.
        Whether the most successful entertainment is delivered through televi-
        sion networks or in the form of video-on-demand through fiber-optic
        cable, satellites, or some other medium may make little difference if the
        messages don’t change. Given that, there is little evidence to date that the
        dominant patterns of image cultivation will show any corresponding
        fragmentation. For most viewers, extended delivery systems signal even
        deeper penetration and integration of the dominant patterns of images
        and messages into everyday life. Nevertheless, the empirical investiga-
        tion of these developments, and their implications for cultivation analysis
        in general and for mainstreaming in particular, represents a major chal-
        lenge for the new century.



                                  REFERENCES

        Bouwman, H. (1984). Cultivation analysis: The Dutch case. In G. Melischek, K. E. Rosen-
           gren, & J. Stapper (Eds.), Cultural indicators: An international symposium (pp. 407–422).
           Vienna: Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
        Bouwman, H. (1987). Televisie als cultuur-schepper. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
        Bouwman, H., & Signorielli, N. (1985). A comparison of American and Dutch program-
           ming. Gazette, 35, 93–108.
        Bouwman, H., & Stappers, J. (1984). The Dutch violence profile: A replication of Gerb-
           ner’s message system analysis. In G. Melischek, K. E. Rosengren, & J. Stappers (Eds.),
           Cultural indicators: An international symposium (pp. 113–128). Vienna: Verlag der Oster-
           reichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
        Gerbner, G. (1958). On content analysis and critical research in mass communication. AV
           Communication Review, 6(2), 85–108.
        Gerbner, G. (1969). Toward “Cultural Indicators”: The analysis of mass mediated mes-
           sage systems. AV Communication Review, 17(2), 137–148.
        Gerbner, G. (1970). Cultural indicators: The case of violence in television drama. Annals of
           the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 388, 69–81.
        Gerbner, G. (1972a). Communication and social environment. Scientific American, 227(3),
           152–160.
        Gerbner, G. (1972b). The structure and process of television program content regulation
           in the U.S. In G. A. Comstock & E. Rubinstein (Eds.), Television and social behavior,
           Vol. 1: Content and control (pp. 386–414). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
           Office.
        Gerbner, G. (1973). Cultural indicators: The third voice. In G. Gerbner, L. Gross, & W. H.
           Melody (Eds.), Communications technology and social policy (pp. 555–573). New York:
           Wiley.
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79