Page 77 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

66 GERBNER ET AL.

Rothschild, N. (1984). Small group affiliation as a mediating factor in the cultivation
process. In G. Melischek, K. E. Rosengren, & J. Stappers (Eds.), Cultural indicators: An
international symposium (pp. 377–387). Vienna: Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie
der Wissenschaften.
Saito, S. (1991). Does cultivation occur in Japan? Testing the applicability of the cultivation
hypothesis on Japanese television viewers. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Annenberg
School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (1999). Nature stories. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Shanahan, J., & Morgan M. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shanahan, J., Morgan, M., & Stenbjerre, M. (1997). Green or brown? Television’s cultiva-
tion of environmental concern. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41(3):
305–323.
Shapiro, M., & Lang, A. (1991). Making television reality: Unconscious processes in the
construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18(5), 685–705.
Shrum, L. J. (1995). Assessing the social influence of television: A social cognition per-
spective on cultivation effects. Communication Research, 22(4), 402–429.
Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of source confusion in cultivation effects may depend on pro-
cessing strategy: A comment on Mares. Human Communication Research, 24(2), 349–358.
Shrum, L. J. (1999). The relationship of television viewing with attitude strength and
extremity: Implications for the cultivation effect. Media Psychology, 1, 3–25.
Signorielli, N. (1986). Selective television viewing: A limited possibility. Journal of Com-
munication, 36(3), 64–75.
Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conven-
tionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21(5/6), 337–356.
Signorielli, N. (1990). Television’s mean and dangerous world: A continuation of the cul-
tural indicators perspective. In N. Signorielli and M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analy-
sis: New directions in media effects research (pp. 85–106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Signorielli, N. (1991). Adolescents and ambivalence towards marriage: A cultivation
analysis. Youth & Society, 23(1), 121–149.
Signorielli, N. (1993). “Television and adolescents’ perceptions about work.” Youth &
Society, 24(3), 314–341.
Signorielli, N., & Kahlenberg, N. (In press). The world of work in the nineties. Journal of
Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
Signorielli, N., & Lears, M. (1992). Children, television and conceptions about chores:
Attitudes and behaviors. Sex Roles, 27, 157–170.
Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (Eds). (1990). Cultivation analysis: New directions in media
effects research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Slater, D., & Elliott, W. R. (1982). Television’s influence on social reality. Quarterly Journal
of Speech, 68(1), 69–79.
Stappers, J. G. (1984). De eigen aard van televisie; tien stellingen over cultivatie en cul-
turele indicatoren. Massacommunicatie, XII(5/6), 249–258.
Sun, L. (1989). Limits of selective viewing: An analysis of “diversity” in dramatic programming.
Unpublished master’s thesis, The Annenberg School for Communication, University
of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Tamborini, R., & Choi, J. (1990). The role of cultural diversity in cultivation research. In
N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects
research (pp. 157–180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tan, A. S., Li, S., & Simpson, C. (1986). American television and social stereotypes of
Americans in Taiwan and Mexico. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 809–814.
Tan, A. S., & Suarchavarat, K. (1988). American TV and social stereotypes of Americans in
Thailand. Journalism Quarterly, 65(4), 648–654.