Page 76 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

3. GROWING UP WITH TELEVISION 65

munication, Department of Communication, University of Massachusetts/Amherst.
Online at http://www.umass.edu/communication/Resources/gulfwar.html.
Mares, M. (1996). The role of source confusions in television’s cultivation of social reality
judgments. Human Communication Research, 23(2), 278–297.
McQuail, D. (2000). Mass communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morgan, M. (1982). Television and adolescents’ sex-role stereotypes: A longitudinal
study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 947–955.
Morgan, M. (1983). Symbolic victimization and real-world fear. Human Communication
Research, 9(2), 146–157.
Morgan, M. (1986). Television and the erosion of regional diversity. Journal of Broadcasting
& Electronic Media, 30(2), 123–139.
Morgan, M. (1987). Television, sex-role attitudes, and sex role behavior. Journal of Early
Adolescence, 7(3), 269–282.
Morgan, M. (1990). International cultivation analysis. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan
(Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research (pp. 225–248). New-
bury Park, CA: Sage.
Morgan, M., Leggett, S., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Television and “family values”: Was Dan
Quayle right? Mass Communication and Society, 2(1/2): 47–63.
Morgan, M., & Rothschild, N. (1983). Impact of the new television technology: Cable TV,
peers, and sex-role cultivation in the electronic environment. Youth and Society, 15(1),
33–50.
Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1992). Comparative cultivation analysis: Television and ado-
lescents in Argentina and Taiwan. In F. Korzenny & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Mass media
effects across cultures: International and intercultural communication annual (Vol. 16,
pp. 173–197). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1995). Democracy tango: Television, adolescents, and authoritar-
ian tensions in Argentina. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Morgan, M., Shanahan, J., & Harris, C. (1990). VCRs and the effects of television: New
diversity or more of the same? In J. Dobrow (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of VCR use
(pp. 107–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1990). Cultivation analysis: Conceptualization and
methodology. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions
in media effects research (pp. 13–34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Nielsen/Netratings (1999). “TV in Internet homes.” Retrieved 11/19/00 from
http://www.nielsenmedia.com/reports/TV%20in%20Interent%20Homes/TV%20In
%20Internet%20Homes.doc.
Nielsen/Netratings. (2000). “Hot off the Net.” Retrieved 12/5/00 from http://
209.249.142.27/nnpm/owa/NRpublicreports.usageweekly; http://209.249.142.27/
nnpm/owa/NRpublicreports.toppropertiesweekly; and http://209.249.142.27/
nnpm/owa/NRPublicReports.Usages.
Piepe, A., Charlton, P., & Morey, J. (1990). Politics and television viewing in England:
Hegemony or pluralism? Journal of Communication, 40(1), 24–35.
Pingree, S., & Hawkins, R. P. (1981). U.S. programs on Australian television: The cultiva-
tion effect. Journal of Communication, 31(1), 97–105.
Potter, W. J. (1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcast-
ing & Electronic Media, 30(2), 159–174.
Reimer, B., & Rosengren, K. E. (1990). Cultivated viewers and readers: A life-style per-
spective. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation Analysis: New directions in
media effects research (pp. 181–206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time.
University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.