Page 213 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 213

a
                                            ___         ______
                             tttn   it1  .II I I   R~wHni.~
            pc,.,,~,,,r,.(rcic)   1Rfl.5   136.1   151.7
            USnotiC  Prv5wre(PS11:)   5.5   2Ll.l   9.9
            NDP(Mras)-   146.R  PSlG
            Rueraqe  Perneate  flux-   14.6  GFD,  Permeate  flow-  400.85  GPH
                       Recouery   Permeate   Feed   Feed   feed
            array  C1.m.   (PerWFeed)   GPD  MC/L   GPR   N6/L  PRESS(PS1G)
            1   1       .EM   5511   2   39.9   452  175.5
                2       .iu3   5335   z   36.1   590  118.1
                3       -111   5190   2   37.4   557  166.6
                4       .122   5062   2   28.8   626  163.2
                5       .136   49b5   3   25.3   713  160.5
                6       .153   4833   3   71.9   824  158.3


           Fe4W &I   D  meRl a'tm                                     Re&
                  Figure 4.6  Cnlculatcdarray water quality and hydraulicdata (ROSA, FilrnTrc)


         4.1.4 Cost calculation
         Some  RO  software  packages  (Koch,  Hydranautics)  include  a  provision  for
         costing,  which  extracts  such  cost  items  as  capital  costs,  pumping  energy
         demand, membrane replacement and chemical dosing, automatically from the
         design  file.  Pumping  energy  costs, for  example, relate  directly to  the  system
         hydraulics. Other specific data, such as labour costs, anti-scalant and cleaning
         chemical  unit  prices,  amortisation,  overheads  and  maintenance,  must  be
         entered by the user. Figure 4.8 illustrates  the CostPro software (Koch), which
         permits fairly comprehensive costing of the RO design. Care must be taken when
         using such packages, since the cost can be sensitive to assumptions made about
         such things as membrane life, period of capital amortisation and interest rate. On
         the other hand, the CostPro software allows  a direct cost comparison  of  two
         candidate designs.
           Cost is also very dependent on the scale of operation. Higher specific costs, i.e.
         cost  prices  per  m3 permeate  product,  result  from  smaller  plants  due to  the
         relatively high capital and maintenance costs, the latter pertaining to labour. A
         more useful basis for specific cost may thus be the cost per unit time, which is
         inversely  related  to  the  amortisation  period  and  increases  with  increasing
         interest  rate.  Given  the  sensitivity  of  costs  to  maintenance  requirements,
         cleaning frequency, membrane and plant life, interest rates and residual value, it
         is  prudent  to  compute  costs  based  on  a  range  of  assumed  values  for  these
         parameters which are, of course, largely beyond the designer's control.
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218