Page 79 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 79

Membrane technolog3  59


           2.4.3 Fouling and pretreatment
           Pretreatment is required to suppress fouling and/or clogging of  membranes, or
           else to remove chemically aggressive constituents such as chlorine. Clogging of
           membrane  channels  by  solid  matter  can,  to  some  extent,  be  controlled
           hydrodynamically,  for  a  cross-flow process, or  by  the appropriate backflush
           regime for a dead-end process. It is only for certain filtration processes and/or
           specific duties,  such  as  filtration  of  municipal  or  laundry  wastewater,  that
           pretreatment to remove gross solids may be critical. In these examples it is the
           filamentous matter that causes a problem, as it can form large aggregates which
           can become tangled with hollow fibres or otherwise clog the membrane channels
           and, for an immersed system, the aerators. Submerged membrane bioreactors for
           sewage treatment thus routinely employ fine screens and/or microstrainers to
           remove these materials.
             Pretreatment  of  membrane filtration  feedwaters can be  analogous to  that
           employed for depth filtration. An example is the use of coagulants to assist in the
           removal  of  natural  organic  matter  (NOM)  from  upland  surface  waters.
           Precoagulation increases overall NOM removal, thereby reducing the propensity
           to  form  trihalomethanes,  as  well  as  producing  a  more  permeable  and  less
           adherent filter cake (Judd and Hillis, 2001).
             The  requirement  for  pretreatment  is  determined  by  the  feedwater
           concentration of:


             0  suspended solids, and colloidal matter in particular,
             0  scalants (sparingly soluble dissolved salts), and
             0  microorganisms and nutrients.


             The  physical  manifestation  of  these  are  briefly  described in  Table  2.13.
           Appropriate pretreatment technology can normally only be identified through
           pilot plant trials or through reference to appropriate case studies. However, in


           Table 2.13  Physical manifestation of foulants
           Foulant                     Symptoms

           Silt/carbon fines           Element may be stained with brown or black material at the
                                       inlet and exhibit low permeate flow. Higher flow and very
                                       poor rejection may occur in later stages due  to irreparable
                                       damage to the membrane by abrasive particles.
           Carbonate scale, suspended silica   Usually on tap water or brackish water elements only. The
                                       element may be noticeably heavier than normal, and will
                                       exhibit low permeate flow and poor salt rejection.
           Iron fouling                Rust colouring. possibly originating from iron pipework, at
                                       inlet ofelement. Element will exhibit low permeate flow and
                                       poor salt rejection.
           Biological growth           Element may have strong odour, possible mould growth and
                                       will exhibit low permeate flow whilst maintaining a high salt
                                       rejection, which can increase with decreasing flux.
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84