Page 141 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 141

The Invisible Whiteness of Being: The Nature of the Beast  115

                     facial features such as nasal index and lip form) that distinguished them from
                     the idealized physical features of the dominant group (fair skin, blue - eyed,
                     straight hair, etc.). Although there is a lack of scientific support for a clear


                     biological definition of race (Helms, Jernigan,  &  Mascher, 2005; Wang  &  S.
                     Sue, 2005; Rowe, 2005), people continue to differentiate between groups on
                     the basis of phenotype. In general the term  “ White, ”  as used in the United
                     States, refers not only to White  Anglo - Saxon Protestants, but other White
                     ethnics as well (Ponterotto, Utsey,  &  Pedersen, 2006). As they point out, the

                     defining Anglolike features, primarily white skin, allowed White ethnics to
                     assimilate and acculturate into mainstream America.
                        The experience of people of color, however, has been qualitatively differ-
                     ent; their physical characteristics were seen as unacceptable by White people
                     who blocked them from fully participating in the  “ land  of  opportunity. ”
                     Thus, a color line that separated visible racial/ethnic minority features from
                     those in the majority (dominant) culture became institutionalized with result-
                     ing psychological, sociological, economical, political, and legal implications.
                     Whiteness became associated with everything desirable, while other physi-
                     cal features became associated with undesirability. In a broad sense, physical
                     differences like Whiteness would not be problematic if it were not predicated
                     on White supremacy, imposed overtly or covertly on people of color, and
                     made invisible to well - intentioned perpetrators (Sue, 2003, 2004).
                         The deleterious effects of racial microaggressions, for example, are cloaked
                     within an invisible White veil. In this manner, perpetrators are allowed to
                     enjoy the benefits that accrue to them by virtue of their skin color. They resist

                     the realization that Whiteness, White supremacy, and White privilege are
                     three interlocking forces that disguise covert forms of racism. It allows many
                     Whites to continue their oppressive and harmful ways while maintaining
                     their individual and collective advantage and innocence. Covert racism hides
                     in the background of Whiteness: (1) it is an unacknowledged secret protected
                     through silence, (2) it advantages many Whites who enjoy unearned advan-
                     tages due to skin color, and (3) it allows many Whites to deny responsibility
                     for how it disadvantages and harms other groups of color (Sleeter  &  Bernal,
                     2004; Tatum, 2002).

                       Four - Step Process Model of Whiteness - to-Racism   Conversion

                      The symbolic manifestation of Whiteness is an everyday occurrence and its
                     normative features are insidiously manifested in our institutions and culture.










                                                                                    1/19/10   6:10:48 PM
          c06.indd   115                                                            1/19/10   6:10:48 PM
          c06.indd   115
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146