Page 356 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 356

292 CHAPTER 3

          decrease with an increase of concentration.  One must try to isolate that part of the
          changes in the ion size parameter that does not reflect real changes in the sizes of ions
          but represents the impact of, for instance, ionic solvation upon activity coefficients.
          This question of the influence of ion–solvent interactions (Chapter 2) upon the ion–ion
           interactions will be considered in Section 3.6.


          3.5.7. Parentage of the Theory of Ion–Ion Interactions
              Stress has been  laid on the contribution of Debye and  Hückel  (1923) to  the
           development of the theory of ion–ion interactions. It was Debye and Hückel who
           ushered in the electrostatic theory of ionic solutions and worked out predictions that
           precisely fitted experiments for sufficiently low concentrations of ions. It is not often
           realized, however, that the credit due to Debye and Hückel as the parents of the theory
           of ionic solutions is the credit that is quite justifiably accorded to foster parents. The
           true parents were Milner and Gouy. These authors made important contributions very
           early in the growth of the theory of ion–ion interactions.
              Milner’s contribution  (1912) was direct.  He attempted to find out the virial 18
          equation for a mixture of ions. However. Milner’s statistical mechanical approach
           lacked the mathematical simplicity of the ionic-cloud model of Debye and Hückel and
          proved too unwieldy to yield a general solution testable by experiment. Nevertheless,
           his contribution was a seminal one in that for the first time the behavior of an ionic
           solution had been linked mathematically to the interionic forces.
                                                     19
              The contribution  of Gouy  (1910) was  indirect.  Milner’s  treatment was  not
           sufficiently  fruitful  because he did not formulate a mathematically treatable model.
           Gouy developed such a model in his treatment of the distribution of the excess charge
          density in  the solution  near an  electrode.  Whereas  Milner sought to describe the
           interactions between series of discrete ions, it was Gouy who suggested the smoothing
           out of the ionic charges into a continuous distribution of charge and took the vital step
           of using Poisson’s equation to relate the electrostatic potential and the charge density
           in the continuum. Thus, Gouy was the first to evolve the ionic-atmosphere model.
              It was with an awareness of the work of Milner and Gouy that Debye and Hückel
           attacked the problem. Their contributions, however, were vital ones. By choosing one
           ion out of the ionic solution and making an analogy between this charged reference
           ion and the charged electrode of Gouy, by using the Gouy type of approach to obtain
           the variation of charge density and potential with distance from the central ion and


           18
            Virial is derived from the Latin word for force, and the virial equation of state is a relationship between
            pressure, volume, and temperature of the form



            where    ....  the  virial  coefficients, represent interactions between constituent particles.
           19
            Chapman made an independent contribution in 1913 on the same lines as that of Gouy.
   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361