Page 357 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 357

ION–ION INTERACTIONS 293

           thus to get the contribution to the potential arising from interionic forces, and, finally,
           by evolving a charging process to get the chemical-potential change due to ion–ion
           interactions, they were able to link the chemical-potential change caused by interionic
           forces to the experimentally measurable activity coefficient. Without these essential
           contributions of Debye and Hückel, a viable theory of ionic solutions would not have
           emerged.

           Further Reading

           Seminal
            1.  G. Gouy, “About the Electric Charge on the Surface of an Electrolyte,” J. Phys. 9: 457
              (1910).
            2.  S. R. Milner, “The Virial of a Mixture of Ions,” Phil. Mag. 6: 551 (1912).
            3. P.  Debye and E.  Hückel, “The Interionic Attraction Theory of Deviations from Ideal
              Behavior in Solution,” Z. Phys. 24: 185 (1923).

           Review
            1. K.  S.  Pitzer,  “Activity Coefficients in Electrolyte  Solutions,” in Activity Coefficients in
              Electrolyte Systems, K. S. Pitzer, ed., 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1991).

           Papers
            1.  C. F. Baes, Jr., E. J. Reardon, and B. A. Bloyer, J. Phys. Chem. 97: 12343 (1993).
            2.  D. Dolar and M. Bester, J. Phys. Chem. 99: 4763 (1995).
            3.  G. M. Kontogeorgis, A. Saraiva, A. Fredenslund, and D. P. Tassios, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
              34:1823 (1995).
            4.  A. H. Meniai and D. M. T. Newsham, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 73: 842 (1995).
            5.  M. K. Khoshkbarchi and J. H. Vera, AlChE J. 42: 249 (1996).


           3.6. ION–SOLVENT INTERACTIONS AND THE ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT


           3.6.1.  Effect of Water Bound to Ions on the Theory of Deviations from
                 Ideality

              The theory of behavior in ionic solutions arising from ion–ion interactions has
           been seen (Section 3.5) to give rise to expressions in which as the ionic concentration
           increases, the activity coefficient decreases. In spite of the excellent numerical agree-
           ment between the predictions  of the interionic attraction theory and experimental
           values of activity coefficients at sufficiently low concentrations  (e.g.,
           there is a most sharp disagreement at concentrations above about 1 N, when the activity
           coefficient begins to increase  back toward the  values  it  had  in  limitingly dilute
           solutions. In fact, at sufficiently high concentrations (one might have argued, when
           the ionic  interactions are greatest),  the activity coefficient, instead of continuing to
   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362