Page 358 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 358

294 CHAPTER 3

           decrease, begins to exceed the value of unity characteristic of the reference state of
           noninteraction, i.e., of infinite dilution.
              A qualitative picture of the events leading to these apparently anomalous happen-
           ings has already been given in Chapter 2. There it has been argued that ions exist in
           solution in various states of interaction with solvent particles. There is a consequence
           that must therefore follow for the effectiveness of some of these water molecules in
           counting as part of the solvent. Those that are tightly bound to certain ions cannot be
           effective in dissolving further ions added (Fig. 3.38). As the concentration of electro-
           lyte increases, therefore the amount of effective or free solvent decreases. In this way
           the apparently  anomalous  increase in  the activity  coefficient  occurs. The  activity
           coefficient is in effect that factor which multiplies the simple, apparent ionic concen-
           tration and makes it the effective concentration, i.e., the activity. If the hydration of the
           ions reduces the amount of free solvent from that present for a given stoichiometric
           concentration, then the effective concentration  increases and the activity coefficient
           must increase so that its multiplying effect on the simple stoichiometric concentration
           is such as to increase it to take into account the reduction of the effective solvent.
           Experiment shows that  sometimes these  increases  more  than  compensate for  the
           decrease due  to  interionic  forces, and  it  is  thus  not unreasonable that the  activity
           coefficient should rise above unity.
              Some glimmering of the quantitative side of this can be seen by taking the number
           of waters in the primary hydration sheath of the ions as those that are no longer effective
           solvent particles. For NaCl, for example, Table 2.18 indicates that this number is about
           7. If the salt concentration is, e.g.,  the  moles of water per liter withdrawn from
           effect as free solvent would be 0.07.  Since the number of moles of water per liter is
          1000/18 = 55.5, the number of moles of free water is 55.43 and the effects arising from
           such a small change are not observable. Now consider a 1 N solution of NaCl. The
           water withdrawn is       and the change in the number of moles of free water
           is from 55.5 in the infinitely dilute situation to 48.5, a significant change. At 5 N NaCl,
















                                Fig. 3.38. The distinction be-
                                tween free water and hydration
                                water that is locked up in the
                                solvent sheaths of ions.
   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363