Page 361 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 361

ION–ION INTERACTIONS 297












              One sees at once that there is a possibility of a change in direction for the change
           in log f  with an increase in concentration in the solution. If the last term predominates,
                 ±
           RT log f may increase with concentration.
                 ±
              The situation here does have a fairly large shadow on it because of the use of the
           expression  (3.120) in   It will be seen (Section 3.14) that, at concentrations as high
           as 1 N, there are some fundamental difficulties for the ionic-cloud model on which this
              expression of Eq. (3.120)  was  based  (the  ionic  atmosphere can no longer be
           considered a continuum of smoothed-out charge). It is clear that when the necessary
           mathematics can be done, there will be an improvement on the   expression, and one
           will hope to get it more correct than it now is. Because of this shadow, a comparison
           of Eq. (3.130) with experiment to test the validity of the model for removing solvent
           molecules to the ions’ sheathes should be done a little with tongue in cheek.


           3.6.3. The Water Removal Theory of Activity Coefficients and Its
                 Apparent Consistency with Experiment at High Electrolytic
                 Concentrations
              If one examines the ion–solvent terms in Eq. (3.130), one sees that since
           and in  general   (more than one hydration water per ion), both the terms are
           positive. Hence, one can conclude that the Debye–Hückel treatment, which ignores
           the withdrawal of solvent from solution, gives values of activity coefficients that are
           smaller than those which take these effects into account. Furthermore, the difference
           arises from the ion–solvent terms, i.e.,






           As the electrolyte concentration increases,   decreases and   increases; hence both
           ion–solvent terms increase the value of log  f. Furthermore, the numerical evaluation
           shows that the above ion-solvent term can equal and become larger than the Debye–
           Hückel    Coulombic term. This means that the    versus   curve can pass
           through a minimum and then start rising, which is precisely what is observed (Fig.
           3.39, where an activity coefficient is plotted against the corresponding molality).
              On the  other  hand,  with increasing  dilution,
                 and       and hence the  terms  vanish, which  indicates  that  ion–solvent
           interactions (which  are  of  short  range) are  significant for  the  theory of activity
   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366