Page 143 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 143

124      Modern  Spatiotemporal  Geostatistics  —  Chapter  5

         usually  much  simpler than what  most geostatisticians are capable of  handling.
         In fact, the most important problems are conceptual rather than mathematical.



         COMMENT  5.8: A s already   mentioned,   th e characterization  "Bayesian"   i n



         the acronym  BME  denotes   the fact that  Bayesian  conditionalization   is  used




         in  th e theoretical  analysis of  the integration stage of  the approach   (see,  e.g.,

         Proposition 4-1  of  Chapter  4,  P-   95).   In   the   eyes   of  some  statisticians,  this

         analysis may   not     in   the   orthodox  Bayesian  framework.   This   is   hardly



         surprising. As   Wang   (1993;  p.158) notices: "There   are  at least 46,656 vari-
         eties of  Bayesians."  This   statement  is,   obviously, a hyperbole  that  serves  to

         stress the fact  that   there are, indeed,  various  kinds  of  Bayesian  approaches,

         including the  orthodox, the  subjective, and  the  epistemic  Bayesianisms.   On


         the other   hand,   the   characterization   "Maximum   Entropy"   in   the   acronym

         BME is   due  to  the fact  that   Equation  5.2   has  the  mathematical form  of   the
         entropy function   used   by   Boltzmann  and   Jaynes   (in   thermodynamics   and



         statistical mechanics;   e.g., Boltzmann,   1964  [1896-98],  Jaynes,  1983),   b y
        Shannon (in   the   description,   storage,  and  transmission  of   messages; Shan-



         non, 1948),   an d b y many   others   (see,   e.g., Ebanks   et al. , 1998).   I n al l






         the above   cases,  however,  the  entropy  functions  were  developed  in   different

         scientific contexts   than   the   spatiotemporal mapping  situation   considered  in

         Equation 5.2.   As   a  matter  of  fact,  it   is   not  uncommon   in   scientific   inves-
         tigations to   start   from  different   origins   and   to   end   up   with   similar  math-


         ematical formulations  of   otherwise   different   physical   situations.   Entropy
         is a   case   in   point.  In   1896,   the  term  was  introduced by Boltzmann  in   the


         kinetic theory   of   gases   in  an   effort   to   measure   disorder   by   means   of   the
        probabilities  of   molecular   arrangements.  In   1948,   while  working  on   com-

         munication engineering  problems,  Shannon  derived   a  working  definition  of

         syntactic information   which,   when   translated   into   mathematical   symbols,

         was identical  to   the   Boltzmann  entropy  function.  Certainly,  from  a  physi-

         cal interpretation  point   of   view,  the  two   entropies  were  drastically  different.

        In light   of   these   examples,   we   conclude  that  the   mathematical   form  of   en-
         tropy arises  in  various  scientific  disciplines,   in  which,   however, it  has  very

         different physical   interpretations.

             By way of a summary,  the  problem  of  how to  integrate the  ^-base  (scien-
        tific theories, physical  laws,  etc.)  with the 5-base (case-specific  data,  empirical
        evidence,  etc.)  when  constructing a space/time  map  has generated  consider-
         able  controversy  in  geostatistics  and  spatial  statistics.  The  BME  approach
        suggests  a solution to  this problem  by using first the 9^-operator to  provide an
         initial specification of the  probability  model  of the  map in terms of the  <j-base,
         and  then  the  ^-operator  to  extend  or  refine  the  starting  model  leading  to  a
        form that  better  represents the 5-base.
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148