Page 138 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 138

Mathematical  Formulation  of  the  BME  Method       119


            It  may  be  possible that,  while  the  multivariate  pdf  f s  is  unknown,  an
        equation  that  describes the  evolution  of  a  lower  level  pdf  can be derived  from
        physical  or  mathematical  considerations  (see  "Some  other  forms  of  general
        knowledge,"  in Chapter 3, p. 81).  A set of g a functions  could then  be properly
        selected  so that  the  stochastic  expectations  ~g^ with  respect to  / § can be cal-
        culated.  Under  these conditions,  the  problem  has essentially  been  reduced  to
        that described above in the  section  "General knowledge in the  form  of random
        field  statistics"  (p. 107).  Let  us consider the  following rather simple example.

        EXAMPLE 5.8:  In Chapter 3, in the  case of  Example 3.11  (p. 82),  the operator
        y g  is simply  given  by 9£ [x;  *]  — fJ-i(t)gi(x)<  where Hi(t)  is the  solution  of  the
        equation



        Depending  on  the  form  of  the  function  g\(-),  this  equation  may  be  solved
        analytically  or numerically.
             In  its  current  formulation,  BME  uses  the  information  measure  (Eq.  5.1)
        and  the  expected  information  or  entropy  (Eq.  5.2).  But  it  may  be  worth
        examining  situations  in  which  one  could  use other  measures  available  in  the
        literature (e.g.,  Aczel and Daroczy, 1975;  Ebanks et al.,  1998).  New measures
        could also be proposed by modern geostatisticians,  as long as they are physically
        meaningful  and  epistemically sound.  In  such  a  case,  entropy  may  not  be  part
        of the  mapping formulation,  and the  letter  "E"  in the acronym  "BME"  should
        be  replaced by another  letter  denoting the  new information  measure.

        The    Meta-Prior     Stage

        In  real-world  applications  the  knowledge  bases  are continuously  refined due  to
        further  interaction  with  the  environment.  At  the  meta-prior  stage we collect
        and  organize specificatory  knowledge 5  in appropriate  quantitative  forms that
        can  be explicitly incorporated  into the  BME  formulation.  In many applications
        a  variety  of  case-specific data  are available, which  usually  makes  the  analysis
        at  the  meta-prior  stage  not  a  trivial  task.  The  quality  and  quantity  of  the
        hard and soft  data  collected  is a matter  of experimental and/or  computational
        investigations.  BME's  concern is that accurate spatiotemporal  maps  be drawn
        from good-quality data and other  sources of  knowledge  by means of acceptable
         rules of reasoning, which can be adequately quantified  in terms of the analytical
        and  computational  tools available.
            As  we  already  saw in  Chapter 4  ("Epistemic  Geostatistics  and the  BME
        Analysis,"  p. 90),  the  distinction  between  prior  and  meta-prior  knowledge is an
        important  epistemic  issue.  Whereas at  the  prior  stage  general  knowledge  (3
        was  introduced,  at  the  meta-prior  stage the  specificatory  knowledge  ,5  is con-
        sidered, including hard and soft  data.  Certain of these kinds of data  have been
        discussed in  Chapter  3 (p.  73,  "The  General  Knowledge  Base"  and p.  82,  "The
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143