Page 195 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 195

176      Modern  Spatiotemporal  Geostatistics —  Chapter 9

         Equations  9.27 through  9.29  permit the  body  of  available knowledge  to  reach
         out  and  seek  relations  beyond  its  present  state.

         EXAMPLE  9.6:  In  the  case  of  the  knowledge  described  in  Proposition  6.1,
         Equations  9.28  and 9.29  reduce to





        and



        An  obvious  difference  between  Equations  7.6  (p.  137)  and  9.31  is that  while
        the  former  determines  the  Xfc-value  at  a  single  point p k  that  maximizes  the
        corresponding  univariate  posterior  pdf,  the  latter  provides the  combination  of
        Xki,  • • • >  Xk p  values at  a set  of  points p fcl, ..., p k  that  maximize the  multi-
        variate  posterior  pdf.

        EXAMPLE 9.7:  For the specificatory knowledge described in Table 6.1 (p.  133),
        Equations  9.28  and 9.29  yield





        and







        which will  be used in the derivation of analytical  results in  Chapter  11.  D

             Mathematically,  in order to  assure that the solution  of the system of equa-
        tions  (Eq.  9.29)  provides the  maximum  multipoint  posterior  pdf estimates, the
        Hessian  of






        must  be negative-definite,  i.e.,  Hf K(Xk)(Q)  < 0 for all q =  (q kl, ...,  Qk p)
        [Hf K(x k)(Q)  =  0 for q =  0 only].  Some  numerical  examples of multipoint
        BME  analysis  are included  in  Chapter  11.
            As  discussed  in  Chapter  1,  scientific  explanation  and  prediction  are  to
        some extent  parallel  processes.  In this context,  the  posterior  pdf  (Eq.  9.28)  is
        useful  not  only  because we wish to  make predictions.  Another  reason for  using
        Equation  9.28  pertains  to  the  goal  of  capturing  significant  generalizations
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200