Page 49 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 49

30       Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics —   Chapter  2


                Table  2.2.  Some  Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries
                              in two-dimensional  space.
           Geometry            Euclidean  Riemannian  Bolyai-Lobachevskian

           Surface               Plane      Sphere         Saddle

           Parallels               1          0            Many

           Curvature               0         >0             <0

           Angular sum
           for  triangles         180°      >180°          <180°


           Ratio  of
           circumference/diameter  7T        <7T            >7T
           of circle




        1983).  The  geometry  of  Riemann  is exemplified by a spherical surface and that
        of  Bolyai-Lobachevski  by a saddle surface.
            Implicit  in  a spatiotemporal  geometry  are certain  hypotheses concerning
        the  way  space  and time  operate.  The  goal  of  modern  geostatistics  is to  find
        what  kind  of  spatiotemporal  structure  we can choose on  £.  Now,  in  other
        words,  given  that  the  set of  events £  forms the  basic  set in space/time,  the
        problem  is to  equip  modern spatiotemporal geostatistics with  a  mathematical
        structure  that captures the  significant  physical relations.  This  important  issue
        is addressed  by the  following postulate.

        POSTULATE 2.3:    Since a set of physical relationships  between  events is
        associated  with a  set  of geometrical  relationships  between  points  in  'E,
        a  spatiotemporal  structure  is imposed  on £  by means  of these physical
        relationships.
            Starting  from  the  assumption  that  relationships  between events  express
        physical knowledge 9£ (laws of nature, scientific  theories, empirical correlations,
        etc.;  see Chapter 3)  and that relationships between points  are geometrical,  the
        implication of  Postulate 2.3 is that the  geometrical  structure we decide  to use
        on  space/time  £  has a strong  influence on which  kinds of  knowledge  ^C we
        can  consider.  Therefore,  while  all  of  the  geometries  are on  an equal footing
        from  a logical  point  of  view,  they  are not  on an equal footing  epistemically.
            Another  important  factor  in the  choice of  a geometry  on the  space/time
        continuum  £  is the concept of £  visualized intrinsically  (or internally)  vs. £
        visualized  extrinsically  (or externally).  To visualize £  internally  is to  imagine
        the  kinds  of  experiences we would  have  if  we were living in such a space/time.
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54