Page 84 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 84

Spatiotemporal  Geometry                    65

        Proof:  Since Equation  2.53  is a separable  space/time  function, we can  study
        spatial  and temporal  parts  separately.  We first concentrate  on the  spatial  part




        Let  us suppose that c x(h)  is a nonnegative  definite function.  Then,  according
                                                                2
        to  Bochner's theorem,  there  exists a unique  Borel  measure fi x  on R  such that




        Since c x (Aft)  =  exp[—A 2  \h\  }  for  all  real  A,  the  uniqueness of  the  Fourier
        transform  implies  that  k  • h  follows  a  one-dimensional  Gaussian  distribution
                                      2
        with  variance 2 |ft| 2  =  f R2  (k  • ft.)  d(j, x(k}.  Hence, $ h(fc)  = fc • ft. is square
        integrable  with  respect  to  /x x,  i.e.,  $/,(&)  6  Z/2(Mz)-  The  map  ft.  —>  -4^  <5 h
                                            2
        becomes  a norm  preserving embedding (R ,  | • |)  into L^^x)-  It then follows
               2
        that  (.R ,  | - | )  should  be a Hilbert space—as a subspace of  L<2(p, x).  However,
                                                      2
        if  the  norm  | • | is defined as the  distance  (Eq.  2.54),  (R ,  \ • \) is not  a Hilbert
        space,  because  we cannot  define  an  inner  product  on R 2  such that  |ft|  =
        (ft,  ft-),  which  leads to  a contradiction.  Therefore,  we conclude that c x(h)  is
        not a nonnegative  definite function.
            In  fact,  a  stronger  result  can  be  proven,  i.e.,  that  under  some general
        assumptions, the  metric in Equation  2.55 must  necessarily be Euclidean (Chris-
        takos  and  Papanicolaou,  2000).  The  validity  of  Proposition  2.1  may be illus-
        trated  by  means of  a  numerical example.

        EXAMPLE   2.29:  The  spectral  density  of  the  Gaussian  covariance of  Equa-
        tion 2.55  is given  by the  following expression






        The  spectral  density  of  Equation  2.57  is plotted  in  Figure  2.15  and,  as shown
        in this  illustration,  has negative  values at  certain  regions.  Thus,  the  Gaussian
        function of  Equation  2.53 is not a permissible covariance model for the distance
        in  Equation  2.54.

            The  example  below  shows that,  unlike  the  Gaussian  function,  the  expo-
        nential space/time function  is a permissible covariance for  the  spatial distance
        in  Equation  2.54.
        EXAMPLE   2.30:  Consider the  exponential  function  in R 2  x  T


        where  \h\  is  defined  as  in  Equation  2.54.  This  is  also  a  separable function,
        thus we can focus on its spatial  component c x(ft) =  exp(-  |ft.|).  The spectral
        density  of  the  latter is
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89