Page 92 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 92

Physical  Knowledge                     73

        interdisciplinary  research focusing  on two  crucial  areas:  (i.)  unifying scientific
        disciplines,  and (ii.)  linking  contamination  with  health  endpoints  for  disease
        prevention  and intervention.  These endpoints  include,  e.g., infectious  diseases,
        cancer,  birth  defects,  immune  system  dysfunction,  behavioral  abnormalities,
        decreased fertility, and altered  metabolism.

            An  important  characteristic  shared  by  both  the  Q  and  S  knowledge
         bases  is that  they  should  be  reliable,  meaning that  the  geostatistician  can
        depend  upon  them  in terms  of  predictability.  Indeed, the  geostatistician's  per-
        sisting  goal  is  to  understand  phenomena  to  such  an  extent  that  the  qual-
         ity  of  space/time  mapping  can  be consistently  improved.  It  is only  through
        valid, organized  physical knowledge  bases that truly  scientific  mapping can be
         achieved.  The  two  knowledge  bases  are described  in  considerable detail  in  the
        following  sections.


         The   General    Knowledge       Base

        The  general  knowledge  base  Q  relies on our ability  to  draw on the experience
         of  previous generations and the  discoveries of others  in the  present.  Therefore,
         Q  denotes  the  background  knowledge  and the justified  beliefs  relative  to  the
         mapping  situation  overall,  and  it  may  include  laws  of  science and  universal
        statements  that  make claims about  the  properties  of  some aspect of  the  uni-
        verse,  structured  patterns  and assumptions, local (phenomenological)  theories,
         previous experience with similar situations  independent  of any case-specific ob-
         servations,  analytic  statements  (justified  on the  basis  of  relations  of  concepts
         and  theories),  synthetic  statements  (whose truth  or  falsehood  is a  matter  of
         experience),  etc.  The  knowledge  offered  by  these  statements  is  considered
         "general"  in the  sense that  it  is vague enough  to  characterize a  large class  of
        fields or situations.
         EXAMPLE 3.2:  The statements  "acids turn  litmus red,"  "the  ozone concentra-
        tion field  has specified mean and covariance,"  and  "subsurface flow  is governed
         by Darcy's  law"  are general statements.  Indeed,  all  acids  have the  property  of
         turning  litmus  red,  several  ozone  fields  may  share  the  same  mean  and  Co-
         variance,  and  various  flow  fields  satisfy  Darcy's  law.  Such  statements  thus
         constitute general knowledge.
             From  an epistemic  viewpoint,  the  general  knowledge  base  Q  may  be  di-
         vided  into two  main  categories:
         •  Analytic  knowledge, which  involves abstract  quantities,  symbols,  logical  re-
         lations,  concepts,  etc.  without  real  counterparts  (e.g.,  "if  A  or B  and not
         B,  then  A").  Other  analytical  statements  may  have  real  counterparts,  but
         their validity  is a matter of definition and/or logic only  (e.g.,  "soil permeability
         values  are nonnegative,"  or  "all  sisters are female").
         •  Synthetic  knowledge,  which  involves statements  of fact,  laws,  and theories.
         The  law of gravitation,  e.g., states that  "two  bodies exert  a force  between each
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97