Page 31 - Multifunctional Photocatalytic Materials for Energy
P. 31

20                                 Multifunctional Photocatalytic Materials for Energy



                                                                     B
                                                        6 )
                 E        E                             4    1.23 V
               e -         e -    CB                    0 J (mA x cm −2  2  Dark
                    +             E F                     1.0  1.2  1.4  1.6  1.8
                   H /H 2
          Cathode                                           Potential(V)
                       hn     E G
                 O 2 /H 2 O
                                  VB
                             Anode                e -
                           h +
                                                             Light
                                                     e -
                         A                           e -
                                                     e -      H 2 O
                                                     e -          O 2 evolution
                               H +           +       e -
                                            H        e -
                      H evolution                    e -      O 2
                       2
                                                     e -
                                                     e
                               H 2                   -
                                                     e -
                                   Cathode         Anode
         Fig. 3.1  (A) Schematic representation of a PEC cell for photoassisted water splitting.
         The inset shows the corresponding energy level diagram, in the case of photocathode and
         photoanode based on a metal and an n-type semiconductor, respectively. E F  and E G  represent
         the Fermi energy level and the system band gap, respectively. (B) Photocurrent density/
         potential curve for a generic photoanode marking the water oxidation potential (1.23 V), at
         which the recorded J values are usually compared. The current density obtained in the absence
         of illumination (dark curve) is also shown.
         A: Adapted with permission from D. Barreca, G. Carraro, V. Gombac, A. Gasparotto,
         C. Maccato, P. Fornasiero, E. Tondello, Supported metal oxide nanosystems for hydrogen
         photogeneration: quo vadis? Adv. Funct. Mater. 21 (2011) 2611–2623. Copyright Wiley, 2011.


         appealing candidates are metal oxides, thanks to their favorable PEC performances
         and stability in aqueous environments [1,16,41,43,44]. Based on the pioneering work
         demonstrating PEC H 2 O splitting with TiO 2  [14,45], several studies have concentrated
         on the search of oxide photoanodes allowing an improved solar light harvesting than
         TiO 2 , which can absorb only a small fraction (≈5%) of the terrestrial solar spectrum
         owing to the high E G  (≈3.2 eV) [13,15,21,40,42,46]. On this basis, research activities
         have focused on alternative oxide semiconductors (Fe 2 O 3,  WO 3 , ZnO, BiVO 4 , etc.)
         [1,27–29,33,47–62]. In this regard, recent advances in nanotechnology and catalysis
         have significantly increased the prospects of developing functional systems capable of
         efficiently converting solar light into chemical fuels [39,63], meeting the challenge of
         sustainable energy production even under Vis light irradiation.
           Within this general context, the present chapter provides a survey of the research
         results obtained in the past decade in the preparation, characterization, and functional
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36