Page 133 - Museums, Media and Cultural Theory In Cultural and Media Studies
P. 133

PUBLIC ||  117

                  children, many of them pre-literate and learning through play. Few of this
                  audience will be descended from the first peoples of America. The exhibition
                  decisions were informed by particular notions about young children’s pleasures
                  and comprehension. A degree of historical accuracy was sacrificed in order to
                  inspire an enthusiasm and empathy for Native American culture in general
                  amongst preschoolers and primary school children. In economic and marketing
                  terms it was a success, attracting a new audience to the museum, many of
                  whom have responded positively to the exhibit. It was not without controversy –
                  some North American visitors have expressed concern and a trustee resigned in
                  reaction to it. The Powhatan nation was not consulted (though it takes a strong
                  position on representations of Pocahontas and has complained to Disney about
                  the historical distortions in the film).
                    This example is not being singled out because it is unique, but rather because
                  it dramatizes some important tensions. It demonstrates how, in museums which
                  are dependent on ticket sales and have limited state support, the goal of broad-
                  ening the audience may take precedence over a consistently accurate representa-
                  tion of a community which has little or no presence in the region. According to
                  Moira Simpson, museums in European nations ‘now distanced from the prob-
                  lems they caused’ have been slow to address issues relating to those populations
                  which have remained in the ex-colonies (Simpson 1996: 2). This is evident in the
                  Pow Wow exhibit. The exhibits in ‘Empire and Us’ as a whole could be read as a
                  very particular, liberal version of imperial history; nevertheless the museum,
                  through its practices and policies, and its community projects (including its
                  radio station) do demonstrate a sensitivity to questions of cultural diversity
                  within Bristol and within Britain. Orientation toward the audience does not
                  necessarily entail consideration or consultation of other stakeholders else-
                  where. The need for caution in the representation of seventeenth-century
                  Virginia is not felt as intensely as it would be in Virginia now, nor as intensely as
                  the need for caution in representing the history of the diverse communities in
                  Bristol. The example of the Pow Wow exhibition shows how increased sensitiv-
                  ity to local cultural diversity does not necessarily correspond to more sensitive
                  representation of all indigenous peoples. It also shows, I think, the non-fit
                  between the current, market-led emphasis on expanded audiences and broader
                  understandings of cultural diversity.
                    Moria Simpson sees museums in non-European Western countries such as
                  Canada, the United States, New Zealand and Australia as more responsive to
                  repatriation claims and questions of cultural diversity due to pressure from
                  indigenous communities (1996: 2). One strategy, practised by the Smithsonian
                  Institution, and again relating to Native American culture, has been to reinvent
                  the colonial museum by integrating Native American cultures and practices
                  within it. The new National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI), a
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138