Page 154 - Book Hosokawa Nanoparticle Technology Handbook
P. 154

FUNDAMENTALS                CH. 3 CHARACTERISTICS AND BEHAVIOR OF NANOPARTICLES AND ITS DISPERSION SYSTEMS
                    If the Hamaker constant A is between A and A ,  For more quantitative estimation, a method using a
                                                     11
                                                           22
                                         33
                  the resulting Hamaker constant A 132  is negative. Thus,  root mean square roughness is proposed [12, 13]. To
                  the two bodies of materials 1 and 2 experience repul-  reduce the van der Waals force through the use of the
                  sive force. The Hamaker constants in air are almost  roughness, nanoparticles are added on the surface of
                  the same as those in vacuum. However, when water  primary particles. This method is widely used in vari-
                  caused by capillary condensation exists between the  ous fields because of the simplicity and effectiveness.
                  surfaces, the effect of the medium 3 should be taken  For large surface roughness, the radius of curvature
                  into consideration [6].                        of asperity summits should also be taken into account
                    The attractive force increases as the separation dis-  for the estimation of the van der Waals force. [14]. In
                  tance decreases as in equation (3.5.1). However, when  addition, particles of irregular shape or complicated
                  the distance is very small, the electron clouds of atoms  surface shape contact at different points on the sur-
                  on the surfaces overlap, and a strong repulsive force acts  face, and therefore the total force of the adhesion
                  on the surfaces, which is known as Born repulsion [1].  should be calculated by summing the force compo-
                  Therefore, there is a stable separation distance z. In gen-  nents in the direction of the adhesion.
                  eral, z 0.4 nm is used for smooth surfaces in gases [7].  In general, particles elastically deform under an
                    On the other hand, when the surfaces are an appre-  applied force if the load is small. The deformation of
                  ciable distance apart, the van der Waals force becomes  a spherical particle can be analyzed by the Hertz the-
                  smaller than the value calculated by equation (3.5.1).  ory [15]. In order to clarify the relationship between
                  This is because the finite speed of light causes a phase  the adhesive force and the deformation, several mod-
                  lag in the charge fluctuation interaction between atoms  els based on the Hertz theory were proposed. The JKR
                  or molecules.  This is referred to as the retardation  theory, developed by Johnson, Kendall and Roberts
                  effect [1, 8, 9]. At distances beyond about 5 nm, the  [16], gives the following equation relating the exter-
                  van der Waals force begins to decrease more rapidly,  nal compressive force F and the van der Waals force
                  and at 100 nm separation, the retarded van der Waals  to the radius of the contact area a.
                  force is about one order smaller than the non-retarded
                  one. Therefore, over 100 nm separation, the van der       ⎡                ⎛  Ad ⎞ 2 ⎤
                  Waals force is negligibly small compared to other  a    3 kd  ⎢ F    Ad     Ad  F   ⎜  2 ⎟  ⎥  (3.5.8)
                                                                     3
                  forces exerted on the surfaces.                        8 ⎢ ⎣   z 8  2  z 4  2  ⎝  z 8  ⎠ ⎥ ⎦
                    Surface roughness also affects the van der Waals
                  force (see Fig. 3.5.1).  The force decreases with
                  increasing roughness, as represented by the following  where k is the reduced elastic constant for two con-
                  equation [10, 11]:                             tacting bodies of different materials with  Young’s
                                                                 moduli (E ,E ) and Poisson’s ratios (  ,  ), i.e.
                                                                         1
                                                                                               1
                                                                                                 2
                                                                           2
                                         Ad
                                F
                                       12( z   b) 2     (3.5.6)                k    1     2 1     1     2 2  (3.5.9)
                                 vb
                                                                                    E 1   E 2
                  where  b is the mean value calculated by the thick-
                  nesses of surface roughness layers b and b .   The values of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio are
                                                     2
                                               1
                                                                 listed in Table 3.5.2 [17]. To obtain a real solution of
                                                                 equation (3.5.8), the following relationship should be
                                      b   b                      satisfied:
                                   b    1  2            (3.5.7)
                                        2                                                  2
                                                                                Ad    ⎛  Ad ⎞
                                                                                   F   ⎜  2 ⎟  	  0   (3.5.10)
                                                                                 z 4  2  ⎝  z 8  ⎠
                                   z
                                                                 Table 3.5.2
                                                   D p2          Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratios [17].
                              D p1                               Material       Young’s modulus    Poisson’s
                                                                                E (Gpa)            ratio   ( )
                          b 1                                    Fe                  206             0.28
                                             b 2                 Cu                  123             0.35
                                                                 Al                   68.5           0.34
                                                                 Quartz glass         75.0           0.17
                                                                 PMMA                  2.33          0.34
                  Figure 3.5.1                                   Polystyrene           1.39          0.35
                  Nano-roughness on particle surfaces.

                  130
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159