Page 529 - New Trends in Eco efficient and Recycled Concrete
P. 529

Sequestration of carbon dioxide                             16


           by RCAs and enhancement of
           properties of RAC by accelerated


           carbonation

           Dongxing Xuan and Chi Sun Poon
           Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic
           University, Kowloon, Hong Kong






           16.1    Introduction

           Nowadays, concrete is very ubiquitous and its annual global production is approxi-
           mately 2.0 tonnes per capita (Hasanbeigi et al., 2012). There is, thus, a great concern
           on its impact on the global environmental carbon footprint, where the production of
           its essential binding agent, cement, is highly energy-and-emissions intensive. It
           accounts for about 5% 8% of current anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 )emissions
           (Gordon et al., 2014). Meanwhile, the construction industry has recently been devel-
           oping rapidly in many developing countries, such as China, where large amounts of
           construction and demolition waste (CDW) are being generated. With accelerated
           industrialisation and urbanisation, these regions would suffer from depletion in natu-
           ral mineral resources and shortages of waste disposal sites. Consequently, recycling
           and reuse of CDW are certainly necessary from the perspective of environmental pro-
           tection and effective utilisation of secondary resources.
              In many countries, reusing recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) produced by
           crushing old concrete debris as a renewable resource in lieu of virgin materials is
           already being promoted (Safiuddin et al., 2013). However, the reuse of RCAs still
           has limitations and their applications are often limited to low-level civil engineering
           works like road sub-bases and non-structural concrete products. The reuse of RCAs
           in structural concrete is still limited. This is mainly because when compared with
           natural aggregates (NAs), RCAs have lower density, higher water absorption, high-
           er porosity and poorer mechanical properties, which would have adverse impacts on
           the new concrete produced with RCAs, resulting in lower strength and modulus and
           poorer durability (Akbarnezhad et al., 2011).
              To effectively facilitate the recycling and reuse of RCAs in new concrete, a
           number of studies had attempted to improve the quality of RCAs and the perfor-
           mance of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) (Quattrone et al., 2014; Tam et al.,
           2005; Ryu, 2002; Kong et al., 2010; Tam et al., 2007; Katz, 2004; Nagataki et al.,
           2004; Kou and Poon, 2010; Tsujino et al., 2007; Shayan and Xu, 2003). Based on
           New Trends in Eco-efficient and Recycled Concrete. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102480-5.00016-6
           © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534