Page 82 - Nightmare Japan Contemporary Japanese Horror Cinema
P. 82

Cultural Transformation                                  69

                              Furthermore, this sequence builds upon its predecessor in its appeal to an
                              almost  hyper-kinetic  presentation  that  requires  the  film’s  viewer  to
                              become  more  acutely  aware  of not only  what they can  see, but, perhaps
                              more  importantly,  what  is  withheld  from  easy  view  or,  quite  possibly,
                              hidden in full sight.
                                     The film’s climactic sequence at Lunatic Theater also capitalises
                              upon  the  apportioning  of  light  and  shadow/darkness,  albeit  in  a  manner
                              that,  given  the  scene’s  setting  on  the  stage  of  an  empty  movie  house,
                              structures  the  inevitable  conflict  between  Ryuzaki  and  Kitami  as  a
                              deliberately  ‘performative’  event  (en)acted  to  call  attention  to  the
                              philosophical  concepts  informing  their  dialogue.  Transpiring  before  an
                              intentionally sparse background in the form of a large white movie screen
                              and  edited  so  that  the  viewer’s  perspective  alternates  between  long,  full
                              and medium shots, the sequence  combines an overtly affected, stage-like
                              remove with the intimacy of classical Hollywood-style continuity editing.
                              As  a  result,  Sato  disallows  spectators  the  comfort  of  a  stable  viewing
                              position.  The  empty  movie  screen  further  heightens  the  spectator’s
                              awareness  of  Muscle  as  an  aesthetically-  and  technologically-coded
                              material object, amplifying the degree to which one must actively engage
                              with  Sato’s  counter-cinematic  text.  Additionally,  accentuated  by  the
                              prominent  use  of  spotlights  both  to  divide  action  within  the  frame  (a
                              practice most noticeable in long shots), and to  emphasise specific verbal
                              and  physical  interchanges  (usually  during  full  and  medium  shots),  the
                              sequence takes on a persistently disruptive, over-determined theatricality.
                              Hence,  Sato’s  manipulation  of  lighting  effects  maximises the  immediate
                              dramatic  impact  of  some  scenes  while,  paradoxically,  rupturing  the
                              verisimilitude of others. Rarely does Sato’s lighting result in the creation
                              of  an  exclusively  ‘realistic’  mise-en-scène.  It  is  within  these  less
                              naturalistic  moments  that  Sato’s  radical  approach  to  cinema  in  general,
                              and  genre  filmmaking  in  particular,  becomes  most  apparent.  A  gesture
                              immediately  reminiscent  of  the  works  of  avant-garde  filmmakers  like
                              Maya Deren  and  Stan Brakhage  and  ‘new  wave’  directors like  Jean-Luc
                              Godard and Oshima Nagisa, this cinematic variation  upon  the Brechtian
                              alienation  effect  is  intensified  by  other  modes  of  mechanical  distortion.
                              These  practices  include:  the  insertion  of  severely  canted  camera  angles
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87