Page 327 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 327

308 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PILE GROUPS

            Table 10.7 Comparison of alternative numerical analyses for a railway viaduct in North
            London

























            for  a  high  safety  factor),  soil  non-linearity  has  a  relatively  small  effect  on  pile
            group response, provided that the group response is calculated using the initial
            value of soil modulus. However, when the factor of safety is low, consideration
            of soil non-linearity becomes essential. It is hoped that the above philosophy will
            find a wider application in design practice.


                      Comparison with field test data by O’Neill et al. (1982)
            O’Neill et al. (1982) reported the results of axial loading tests on single piles and
            pile groups driven into a stiff overconsolidated clay at a site located in Houston.
            The piles were closed end tubular steel pipes with Young’s modulus of 210 GPa,
            external diameter 274 mm, wall thickness 9.3 mm and a penetration depth of 13.
            1 m. The group piles were connected by a rigid cap with a clearance of 0.9 m
            from  the  groundline  and  were  arranged  in  a  3×3  configuration  with  centre-to-
            centre  spacing  of  three  pile  diameters.  The  soil  parameters  adopted  for  the
            PGROUPN   non-linear  analysis  are  based  on  the  data  summarised  by  Poulos
            (1989)  in  his  Rankine  Lecture,  i.e.  a  profile  of  the  initial  soil  modulus  of  100
            MPa  at  ground  level,  increasing  linearly  to  400  MPa  at  the  pile  base  level  (as
            deduced from seismic cross-hole data), and a profile of undrained shear strength
            of  40  kPa  at  the  surface,  increasing  linearly  to  175  kPa  at  the  level  of  the  pile
            base (as deduced from laboratory triaxial tests). The soil Poisson’s ratio and the
            adhesion  factor  have  been  taken  as  0.5,  while  the  hyperbolic  curve  fitting
            constants have been assumed to be 0.0 for the shaft and 0.99 for the base.
   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332