Page 93 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 93

74 D.S.JENG
            leads to higher pore pressure. In the same manner, with a decrease in E  the soil
                                                                      z
            will  be  weaker  in  the  vertical  direction  than  in  the  horizontal  direction.  This
            encourages greater seepage in the vertical direction, which again leads to higher
            pore pressure.
              Figure 3.7 illustrates the effect of changing the cross-anisotropic constant, m,
            in both coarse and fine sand. With an increase in m there is a subsequent increase
            in  the  pore  pressure,  p/p .  With  an  increase  in  the  shear  modulus,  G ,  or  a
                                                                       z
                                 o
            decrease in the Young’s modulus, E , there is an increase in the cross-anisotropic
                                         z
            constant, m. As a result of m increasing, there is an increase in the pore pressure.
            The  pore  pressure  increases  as  the  water  will  be  able  to  penetrate  the  seabed
            easier in the vertical direction than in the horizontal direction. The pore pressure
            in coarse sand is greater, however there is less variation with the increase in m
            (Figure  3.7(a)).  As  shown  in  Figure  3.7(b),  the  increase  in  m  has  a  great
            influence  on  the  pore  pressure.  Thus,  the  value  of  m  can  be  said  to  be  more
            critical in fine sand.
              It is common to find gas within marine sediments. For example, samples taken
            from  Mississippi  Delta  sediments,  equilibrating  when  they  are  exposed  to
            atmospheric pressure, have a degree of saturation between 75% and 95% (Esrig
            and  Kirby,  1977).  It  is  believed  that  most  marine  sediments  have  degrees  of
            saturation very close to unity, implying nearly full saturation (Pietruszczak and
            Pande, 1996). However, it is rare that full saturation can be attained in field or
            laboratory conditions, except for an ideal condition.
              Figure  3.8  highlights  the  influence  of  a  varying  degree  of  saturation  on  the
            pore pressure (p/p ) around the buried pipeline. Obviously, with a higher degree
                          o
            of  saturation  the  pore  pressure  should  be  larger.  The  pore  pressure  around  the
            pipe  is  much  higher  in  coarse  sand  (Figure  3.8(a)),  compared  with  that  in  fine
            sand (Figure 3.8(b)).


                                Effects of geometry of the pipe
            Besides the influences of soil characteristics, the geometry of the buried pipe is
            another  important  factor  that  must  be  considered  in  the  analysis  of  the  wave-
            seabed-pipe interaction problem. The geometry of the pipe (including the burial
            depth and pipe radius) is particularly important for the design of the pipeline with
            respect to economic concerns.
              Burial depth is an important factor that must be taken into consideration for
            the design of the pipeline. The burial depth of the pipeline (b) is defined as the
            distance from the seabed surface to the top of the pipeline. The influence of the
            burial  depth  (b)  on  the  wave-induced  pore  pressure  against  the  polar  angles
            around  the  pipe  surface  is  illustrated  in  Figure  3.9.  In  the  figure,  the  pore
            pressure (p/p ) in coarse sand is slightly higher than in fine sand. This would be
                      o
            expected  as  coarse  sand  is  more  porous  than  fine  sand,  as  larger  voids  are
            present.  However,  it  should  be  noted  that  the  pore  pressure  is  only  marginally
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98