Page 133 - Open-Hole Log Analysis and Formation Evaluation

k
to
at
the
Log
k=
k=
Log
k=
=
RFT
RFT
k=
also
k=
DST
zone
Core
Core
ships
since
made
the
where
ferent
Again,
4
be
Many
Method
swelling
Pressure
(79
testers
Pressure
fall
examples
and
(250
they
0.136
0.105
X
X
time
in
X
near
analysis
analysis
buildup
Obviously
X
investigation
many
analysis
analysis
X
X
are:
into
are
permeabilities
results.
@
heterogeneous
drawdown
(RFT)
¢
the
As with porosity,
the
those
expected
of the
buildup
measurements
measurement
X
two
6%
6
X
in
orders
drawdown
investigators
X
of each
X&
that
that are
and
(chapter
from
[140/h@,
[122/b(py
the
the invaded
of
made
(chapter
-
8
reservoir.
-
and
Sy)
influenced
Disparate
there are
have
the
5,7?
26)
S,;')?
$,,?
different
wellbore
by
X
:
29)
.
apply
zone,
categories:
method.
pg)]*
it
p,)]*
measurement
many
<
Where
by,the
drillstem
5
In
lower than
10
is
10°
107
10°
results
(logs,
(gas)
buildup
Coils)
only
magnitude
(for
pressure
to
(for
to
the
to
to
those
wireline
methods
permeability
ways
type
attempted
tests
in
to3
are
be
to
to
of
10
10°
and
from
10°
tolo!
that
X
(standard
cores,
GW)
the
also
separate
decreasing
or
OAW) |
of fluid
logging
107
(chapter
apply
RFT
to
expected
the
correlate
(air
wireline
order
30)
be
tools.
or
drilling process
measurements
Timur
true permeabilities.
Rose
after
that
temperature
Raymer
transition
above
measurement
reservoir
tests)
rock
Chevron
(1984)
has
these
of
repeat
the
and
effective
made
These
Approximate radius of investigation, feet
(1968)
brine)
the
Wyllie
zone.
will
(1950)
are:
on
estimate permeability.
expected
A
caused
produce
and
used
radius
in
conditions).
Freeman
transition
cores,
dif-
few
for
Disparities can
permeability
sample
measurements
relation-
reflect
a
formation
clay
These
of

Ww
aq
=
é
2
.
2
Fr
=
3
§
2
5
c
g
2
S
N
=
;
10
30
50
0
O

“TTT
Schlumberger
to
4.
#
Pg
P,
Py
Sw:
In
_
Figure
is
straight
.
is
‘is
yield
is
is
is
AO
THE
‘the
measured
resistivity,
FIGURE 6.12
the
the
the
6.12
line
linear—that
9.93
in
relationship
Schlumberger
see
is,
values
height
oil
in
. ; Permeon, ah 1, x 60 0.0! Gas 3 ‘ include: | PERMEABILITY MEASUREMENTS OF i SYSTEMS OF ROCK/FLUID 6. 119 OF RESULTS OF ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION II. METHODS 118
gas
a
PHYSICS
in
of
water
fractional
transition
fractional
15
4,
shows
O-m/ft
above
&.
transition
a
?,
40
. | ——__| .005
feet
density
chapter
density
the
zone
in
density
in
7)
Well Services.
porosity
transition
zone,
from
in
—__|
graphic
20
irreducible
g/cc
and
g/cc
the
02
Porosity,
2.5
g/cc
zone.
a resistivity log on a
transition
Permeability Estimation
water
then
5
A
free-water
/
eee
iN
The
p.u.
25
/
04
zone;
200
above
10

@
resistivity
level

:
Met
related
the
/
goo
06
to
20
saturation
to
and
A
resistivity
4
&
is first normalized by division
68
y
30
/
the
linear scale will
~~
/
S.-
Midarcig 5
12°?
gradient
to
top
are
is
rr
gradient
representation
Z
£2
provided
Oe
L
0
4
Transition Zone.
35
of the

-
that
s
2
£2
4000
70°
~~
the
(AR/AD)
by R, (the wet rock
frequently showa
of the Wyllie and Rose
crossplotted
commonly
Courtesy

2002 SL

20

40
400

2