Page 214 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 214

CHAPTER 10      A New Way of Looking at Things                                  193


           FIGURE 10-10
                                                               Period
           Time-phased          Lead Time: 3
           order point: actual  Safety Stock: 15       1  2   3  4   5  6   7
           demand is less
           than forecast.       Gross Requirements    30 30 30 30 30 30 30         A
                                Schedule Receipts                   80
                                On Hand           140  110 80 50 20 70 40 10

                                Planned-Order Releases          100



                                Actual Demand
                                In First Period: 0

                                Gross Requirements        30 30 30 30 30 30        B
                                Schedule Receipts                       80
                                On Hand              140 110 80 50 20 70 40
                                Planned-Order Releases              100



             Suppose that actual demand in the first period turns out to be zero rather than the
        forecast 30, as shown in Figure 10-10B, which shows the status of the item at the begin-
        ning of period 2. On-hand inventory at that time will be 140 instead of the previously pro-
        jected 110. This will affect net requirements and coverage. Note that both the open and
        the planned orders have been moved back one period because the date of need has reced-
        ed. If there is no demand in period 2, these orders again will be moved back; if demand
        equals forecast, the orders will stay as presently scheduled, but if demand exceeds fore-
        cast (in our case, by 6 or more units), they will be moved forward.
             Suppose that actual demand for the same item turns out to be 90 in period 1 instead
        of the forecast 30, as shown in Figure 10-11B. This, of course, will have changed the quan-
        tity on hand at the end of period 1 to 50 as opposed to the previously projected 110. This,
        in turn, changes both the open-order and planned-order schedules. Since the date of need
        has advanced, all orders have been moved forward, and the first planned order will be
        released in the current period, which would not have been the case if actual demand had
        equaled forecast.
             These examples show that no matter how large the forecast error may prove to be, the
        time-phased order-point technique makes an automatic adjustment and goes on from there.
        The self-adjustment characteristic of this technique, as it applies to open orders, is particu-
        larly significant because the gross and net requirements for independent-demand items are
        expected to keep changing owing to forecast error. In the first of the two examples, it is
        important to note that should there never be any more actual demand, the open order will
        never be finished (no more cost incurred), and no planned order will ever be released.
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219