Page 29 - Partition & Adsorption of Organic Contaminants in Environmental Systems
P. 29

20    FUNDAMENTALS OF THE SOLUTION THEORY

              The inability of Raoult’s law to account for the solution behavior of a
           macromolecular substance is illustrated in the next example. Consider a binary-
           component system in which the two components (1 and 2) have similar struc-
           tures and compositions (e.g., styrene and polystyrene) and their molecuclar
           weights are 100 and 10,000 daltons, respectively. Assume that the solution is
           made 10% by weight of component 1 and 90% by weight of component 2. The
           mole fractions calculated for components 1 and 2 are thus x 1 = 0.917 and x 2 =
           0.083. Since in this case x 1 is close to 1,Raoult’s law would suggest that g 1 should
           approach 1 and thus P 1 should be close to P° 1. However, the measured P 1 in this
           case is only about 0.1P° 1 instead. To reconcile this deviation on the basis of
           Raoult’s law, one would be forced to assume that g 1 = 0.11 (i.e., g 1 < 1), but this
           assumption cannot be justified because there is no evidence for a specific inter-
           action between the two molecularly similar components.
              Consider a binary solution consisting of a small molecule with a molar
                                                                              .
           volume of V 1  and a linear polymer of a molar volume of  , in which V 2  >>V 1
                                                            V 2
           By a statistical treatment of the number of spatial configurations that compo-
           nent 2 may assume in mixing with component 1, Flory (1941) and Huggins
           (1942) developed a thermodynamic expression for the free energy of mixing
           between components 1 and 2. The chemical activities of components 1 and 2
           are given as

                               lna 1 =  lnf 1 + ( 1-  V V 2 )f 2 + c f  2 2  (2.10)
                                                        1
                                               1
           and

                            lna 2 =  lnf 2 - ( V V 1 -  1)f 1 + c 1 ( V V 1 )f 1 2  (2.11)
                                         2
                                                        2
           where a i is the activity of component i, f i is the volume fraction (where f 1 +
           f 2 = 1), and c 1 is the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter for component 1
           [i.e., the sum of its excess enthalpic (c H) and entropic (c S) contributions to its
           incompatibility with component 2]. The  c H term accounts for the heat of
           mixing, similar to the lng term in Raoult’s law. For systems with completely
           linear and flexible polymer segments, the entropy of mixing for components 1
           and 2 is given by the first two terms to the right in Eqs. (2.10) and (2.11). The
           c S term corrects for the entropy loss upon mixing when the polymer suffers
           certain restriction on its orientation. Thus, c S is approximately 0 if the polymer
           segments are highly flexible to adopt a large number of spatial orientations.
                               / ) term may be viewed as the c 2 term for component
           In Eq. (2.11), the c 1 (V 2  V 1
           2. As seen, if there is no molecular-size disparity between the two components,
                     ), Eqs. (2.10) and (2.11) are then reduced to Raoult’s law, since in
           (i.e.,V 1  = V 2
           this case x 1   f 1 , x 2   f 2 , and c= lng.
              As seen later, Eq. (2.10) offers a more general account of the activity of
           an organic solute with natural organic matter and biological lipids, where a
                                                             V      0, Eq. (2.10)
           moderate-to-large molecular-size disparity is observed. If  /V 21
           then becomes
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34