Page 67 - Partition & Adsorption of Organic Contaminants in Environmental Systems
P. 67

58    CONTAMINANT PARTITION AND BIOCONCENTRATION
                                                (l)
           rather than their supercooled-liquid logS w of -4.48 and -5.24mol/L, in the
           logK ow –logS w plot, the resulting data points would shift toward the left by
           0.66 and 0.94 unit, respectively, which would then separate these data points
           from the rest and reduce the overall logK ow –logS w correlation. Another vivid
           example of the melting-point effect on  S w , and thus on the logK ow –logS w
           correlation, is illustrated by the  S w and  K ow data of  m-dichlorobenzene
           and  p-dichlorobenzene (Table 5.1). At room temperature, the  S w of the
           para isomer, which is a solid, is about half that of the meta isomer, which is a
           liquid, but the supercooled-liquid para isomer and the liquid meta isomer
                                 (l)
           exhibit about the same S w and hence about the same K ow , as expected. The
           same is true for phenanthrene and anthracene at room temperature in that
           the two solid isomers differ significantly in melting point (101 and 216°C,
                                                (s)
           respectively) and in water solubility (logS w =-5.14 and -6.60, respectively)
                                                      (l)
           but they display comparable supercooled-liquid S w and thus K ow , as shown in
           Table 5.1.
              The observed logK ow –logS w correlation [Eq. (5.3)] together with the
           octanol–water ideal line [Eq. (5.2)] provides an effective means to account for
           the change in solute solubility in the octanol phase with increasing solute log
           K ow or decreasing solute logS w . By treating octanol as a lipidlike substance,
           as substantiated later, one can see how the lipophilicity of a group of solutes
           varies with S w . The lipophilicity of a solute should in a strict sense be related
           to the inverse of g* o . The logg* o values of most solutes, except highly insoluble
           ones such as DDT and HCB, are simply equal to the vertical distances between
           the ideal line and the experimental line in Figure 5.1. As noted, this vertical
           distance increases with decreasing S w . This implies that in a homologous series
           of solutes, the higher-molecular-weight, less water-soluble compounds (i.e.,
           the ones with larger  K ow values) are not more lipophilic than the more
           water-soluble compounds. According to the g* o data, the solute affinity with
           octanol decreases with increasing  K ow (or decreasing  S w ), indicating that
           there is actually an increase in solute–octanol incompatibility as the solute
           molecular-weight increases. In essence, the higher K ow values, or lipid–water
           partition coefficients, for the latter solutes result from their much lower S w
           values rather than from their enhanced solubilities in octanol (or a lipid). To
           avoid the confusion of the term lipophilicity or lipophilic being used to refer
           to a compound, one must keep in mind that it only implies that the compound
           has a high lipid–water partition coefficient (i.e., its solubility in lipids is sig-
           nificantly higher than that in water). Thus, although all compounds with
           low S w values tend to be lipophilic, their solubilities in lipids usually bear no
           direct relation to the order of their solvent–water or lipid–water partition
           coefficients.
              The correlation presented in Eq. (5.3) has also been found to give a rea-
           sonable account of the partition coefficients for many other classes of organic
           compounds, including moderately soluble alcohols, ketones, and ethers and
           sparingly soluble esters, alkyl halides, alkanes, and alkenes (Chiou et al.,
           1982b). This wide correlation for solutes of many classes presumably results
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72