Page 125 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 125

118                       TOMNENON

              of  reasoning,  and  reasoning  itself  in  mathematical  and  formal  logical
              terms,  it  seemed  quite  natural  to  think  of  machines  as  duplicating  what
              made  mental  processes  a  form  of  intelligence.  Hence  the  name  "artificial
              intelligence,"  usually  shortened  to  "AI" and  applied  not  only  to  the  man-
              made  systems  of  machines  and  programs,  but  to  a  whole  approach
              governed  by  the  model  of  reasoning as  symbol  manipulation  according  to
              formulae  or  algorithms  both  in  man  and  machines."^  Cognitive  science
              emerged  as a  distinct  field  by gathering  together  researchers  from  various
              disciplines  around  this  model  of  intelligence  or  cognition  as  symbol
              manipulation  according  to  pre-set,  programmed  rules.
                Within  about  the  last  six  or  seven  years,  however,  there  has  emerged
              a  new  way  of  thinking  about  these  issues,  one  that  can  be  seen  both  as
              a  competitor  within  the  field  of  cognitive  science  or  "classic  AI,"  and  in
              another  sense  as  a  possible  successor  to  the  project  of  cognitive  science
              as  a  whole.  It  is  a  competitor  in  the  sense  that  it  offers  a  competing
              model  of  information  processing  that  could  change  the  way  systems  and
              machines  are  constructed  to  perform  cognitive  tasks,  especially  those  that
             were  difficult  or  impossible  to  accomplish  with  classic  computers.  If
              successful,  it  would  be  a  successor  in  that  it  could  be  seen  as  displacing
              the  classic  project  of  explaining  all  cognition  in  terms  of  rule-governed
             symbol  manipulation.  Even  so,  most  versions  of  Connectionism  at  this
             point  still  share  with  classic  AI  some  of  the  same  basic  assumptions
             about  the  possibility  of  drawing  important  conclusions  about  human
             intelligence  from  non-human information processing systems, although they
             tend  to  emphasize  the  reverse  direction  more  strongly,  i.e.,  they  think
             that  one  can  derive  at  least a  few  clues  from  human cognition about how
             to  construct  expert  systems  that  would  be  better  able  to  accomplish  the
             kinds  of  things  that  human  beings  do  well,  but  classic  machines  do  not.
             These  include  such  tasks  as  pattern  recognition,  especially  where  all  of
             the  relevant  parameters  are  not  spelled  out  in  advance;  dealing  with
             vagueness;  and  handling  multiple-constraint  problems  with  indefinite
             outcomes.
                Connectionism  is  a  new  way  of  thinking  about  things  that  is  at  least
             indirectly  and  partially  inspired  by  the  model  of  the  human  brain  as  a



             philosopher)  like the formulae of  formal  logic." (1-2)

                *  A  phrase  chosen  here  simply  for  the  sake  of  alliteration.  It  is  not  intended  to
             imply any particular stance on the recently popular question as to whether such a model
             reflects a specifically  gendered, i.e., male way of thinking or not.
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130