Page 217 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 217

210                     DON MARIETTA

              another excess.  As  a  feminist  I  say  my curse  upon both houses, and I am
              not  taking  a  maverick  position  in  doing  this.  For  me  one  reason  for
              seeking  to  understand  the  role  of  emotion  instead  of  rejecting  it  out  of
              hand  or  considering  it  an  incubus  to  be  overcome  is  the  phenomenologi-
              cal  insight  that  thinking,  feeUng,  and  intention  to  act  are  intertwined  in
              most  activities.  The  idea  of  learning  through  the  emotions  is  not  absurd,
              even  though  we  have  not  mastered  the  doing  of  it  very  completely.
              Probably  we  can  all  recall  experiences  in  which  we  did  not  realize  the
              full  value  of  something  until  we  realized  the  emotions  which  it  aroused
              in  us.  In  anger  or  in  tears  we  learned  something  about  what  we  valued
              which  we  had  not  realized  in  calm  intellectualizing.
                To  reject  critical  thinking  or  to  reject  feeling  would  be  to  reject  part
              of  what  we  are.  Historically,  we  philosophers  have  favored  intellect.  In
              reaction  to  that  some  of  us  might  say  things  about  emotion  which  sound
              extreme  when  interpretted  literally.  It  will  be  a  good  practice,  I  think,  for
              us  to  avoid  recoiling  in  horror  at  what  appear  to  be  extreme  statements
              until  we  find  out  whether  the  person  means  them  to  be  taken  in  the
              extreme  sense.  If  we  do  not  practice  this  precaution, we  may  fail  to  hear
              something  very  useful  and  valuable.
                I  believe  that a  cooperative  endeavor,  taking  advantage  of  the  intuitive
              and  adventuresome  work  of  feminists  and  the  technical  skill  and
              exactitude  of  phenomenologists, will  reward  the  overcoming  of  any  initial
              trepidation of  either  side  in relating  to scholars whose  styles  are  different.
              Both  sides  will  benefit  from  overcoming  any  annoyance  or  frustration
             with  the  style  of  the  other.  These  two  approaches  to  philosophy  are  too
              important  and  have  too  much  to  give  the  other  for  us  to  avoid  an
              encounter  which  might  go  a  long  way  toward  improving  the  way  we
              practice  philosophy.  This  cooperation  might  also  contribute  heavily  to
              our  efforts  to  save  human  life,  all  life,  on  the  planet.
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222