Page 223 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 223

216        STANFORD     M.  LYMAN & LESTER     EMBREE

                But  these  'nations*  occupied a  different  status  than  that  of  European
              nationalities? Exactly,  and  that  was  because  the  key  term  "domestic"
              modified  the  word  "nation."  Whereas  the  Indians  had  wanted  to  be
              treated  in  the  same  diplomatic  manner  as  a  European  state,  that  was
              the  one  thing  that was  not  going  to  be  allowed.  They were,  the  Supreme
              Court  opinion  went  on  to  say,  "in  a  ward-like  relationship"  to  the
              Federal  Government,  and,  because  of  their  unique  status,  in  "pupilage."
              Those  words  have  resulted,  by  the  way,  in  a  separate  body  of  law,  i.e.,
              forty  volumes  or  so,  of  American  Indian  law,  in  which only some  lawyers
              are  specialists.*  The  original  compiler  of  that  jurisprudential  tradition  is
              the  late  Felix  Cohen  (1907-1953),  son  of  the  philosopher  Morris  Cohen
              (1880-1947).
                The  American  Blacks  are  in  a  still  different  position,  but  it  also
              modifies  the  plurahst-assimilationist  debate.  Periodically,  from  the  18th
              Century on, various  forms  of  secessionist  movements  arose  among  Blacks
              in  America.  Some  took  the  form  of  back-to-Africa  movements,  e.g.,  one
              in  1714,  another  in  1817,  another  in  1859,  another  from  1896  to  1915,
              and,  in  the  1920s,  Marcus  Garvey's  Universal  Negro  Improvement
              Association  and  its  movement.  In  other  cases,  secessionists  looked  not  to
              Africa,  but  rather  to  some  place  outside  the  United  States  where  Blacks
              might  live  freely—e.g.,  various  islands,  Canada,  and  such  like.  A  third
              case  occurred  only once  to  my knowledge,  in  the  late  1800s.  Some  Blacks
              proposed  that  the  New  Mexico  and  Arizona  territories  be  set  aside  as
              locally  autonomous  Negro  states  inside  the  United  States.
                Was that  on  the  model  of  Oklahoma as  Indian  Territory?  Not  quite.
             The  declaration  of  certain  territories  as  "Indian Territories" was  made  by
              the  United  States  independent  of  the  wishes  of  the  Indians.  The
              Oklahoma  territory  resulted  from  the  "trail  of  tears"  followed  by  the
              Cherokees  driven out of  Georgia  in  1829-1831. There were  also  proposals
              to  deport  Blacks  to  Africa,  the  Caribbean,  and  Latin  America.  The
             American   Colonization  Society,  started  by  President  James  Monroe,
              founded  Liberia  and peopled  it with  manumitted  slaves.  President  Lincoln
             also  proposed  more  than  one  deportation  plan.
                Looked  at  over  the  long  haul,  such  secessionist  movements  seem  to
             arise  when  Blacks  despair  of  ever  becoming  full-fledged  citizens,  come



                  * For  a  summary,  see  Stephen  L.  Pevar,  The Rights of Indians and  Tribes:  The
             Basic  ACLU  Guide  to  Indian  and  Tribal  Rights  (Carbondale:  Southern  Illinois
             University  Press,  1992).
   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228