Page 69 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 69

62                    RICHARD    M  ZANER

                The  involvement  of  the  ethicist  is  a  work  of  practical  distantiation:
              reflective,  circumstantial  understanding  ("detective  work")  whose  primary
              focus  is  the  relationship  itself^the  set  of  multiple  interrelationships,
              significances  and  weights—seeking  to  enable  or  empower  those  whose
              situation  it  is  and  who  must  make  needed  decisions.  The  clinical  ethicist
              is  thus  to  be  held  accountable,  in  ways  appropriate  to  that  work:  to  be
              responsible  for  what  is  and  is  not  said  and  done,  and  responsive  to  those
              whose  situation  it  is  (and  who  request  the  ethicist's  involvement  in  the
              first  place).
                The  narrative  forms  people  give  to  their  illnesses  are  displayed  and
              embodied  in  a  range  of  feehngs  that  are  most  immediately  lodged  in
              specific  images  and  figures,  which  become  expressed  in  prevailing
              commonsense  categories  (in  some  part  personal,  in  large  part  socially
              derived),  and  include  the  person's  own  understanding  of  the  clinician's
              words,  gestures,  settings,  and  conducts.  Their  relationship  is,  while
              asymmetrical,  a  special  form  of  mutuality:  the  encounter  between
              reflexively,  intimately  related  selves  within  an  experienced  asymmetry  of
             vulnerability  and  power,  whose  exercise  is  under  profound  moral
              constraints.
                If  nothing  else,  the  phenomenological  explication  of  the  clinical
             event—with  its  emphatic  focus  on  the  specific  circumstances,  experien-
             ces,  interpretations,  feelings  and  circumstances  of  those  actually  involved;
             on evidence;  and on  freely  considering and  varying  the  range  of  examples
             in  order  to  detect  and  give  faithful  expression  to  the  themes  invariant  or
             common   to  clinical  encounters—forces  us  to  re-think  not  only such  topics
             as  "informed  consent"  or  "confidentiality,"  but  more  fundamentally,  to
             appreciate  the  range  of  evident  feelings  that  are  situationally  displayed  as
             embodied expressions  or presentations of  the  participants' moral concerns,
             their  own  sense  of  **what's  worthwhile."  Through  that,  interesting  and
             important glimpses  into  the  sense  of  the  moral  order  itself  are  achieved.^^











                  ^^ An  earlier  version  of  this  paper  was  presented  at  the  annual  meeting  of
             the  Society  for  Phenomenology  and  the  Human  Sciences,  in  Memphis,  TN,  October
             18,  1991.
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74