Page 345 - Physical chemistry understanding our chemical world
P. 345

312    ELECTROCHEMISTRY

                      The activity of a solution  It is unwise to speak in broad terms of ‘the activity of
                      a solution’ because so many different situations may be considered. For example,
                      consider the following two examples.
                                        (1) The activity of a mixture of liquids. It is rarely a good idea to
              Amalgams are liquid     suggest that the activity of a liquid in a mixture is equal to its mole
              when very dilute, but   fraction x because of complications borne of intermolecular inter-
              are solid if the mole   actions (e.g. see Chapter 2 and Section 5.6 concerning Raoult’s
              fraction of mercury     law). Thankfully, it is generally rare that an electrochemist wants
              drops below about 70    to study liquid mixtures of this sort (except amalgams diluted to a
              per cent.               maximum mole fraction of about 1 per cent metal in Hg), so we
                                      will not consider such a situation any further.
                        (2) The activity of a solute in a liquid solvent. The activity a and concentration c
                      may be considered to be wholly identical if the concentration is tiny (to a maximum
                                          −3
                      of about 10 −3  mol dm ), provided the solution contains no other solutes. Such a
                      concentration is so tiny, however, as to imply slightly polluted distilled water, and is
                      not particularly useful.
                        For all other situations, we employ the Debye–H¨ uckel laws (as below) to calculate
                      the activity coefficient γ . And, knowing the value of γ , we then say that a = (c ÷
                      c ) × γ (Equation (7.25)), remembering to remove the concentration units because
                       O
                      a is dimensionless.



                       Why does the cell emf alter after adding LiCl?

                      Ionic ‘screening’

                      Consider the Daniell cell Zn|Zn ||Cu |Cu. The cell emf is about 1.1 V when pre-
                                                        2+
                                                  2+
                      pared with clean, pure electrodes and both solutions at unit activity. The emf decreases
                      to about 1.05 V after adding lithium chloride to the copper half-cell. Adding more
                      LiCl, but this time to the zinc solution, increases the emf slightly, to about 1.08 V.
                                        No redox chemistry occurs, so no copper ions are reduced to
                                                                                     2+
              In fact, a similar result  copper metal nor is zinc metal oxidized to form Zn . No com-
              is obtained when adding  plexes form in solution, so the changes in emf may be attributed
              most ionic electrolytes.  entirely to changing the composition of the solutions.
                                        Lithium and chloride ions are not wholly passive, but interact
                                      with the ions originally in solution. Let us look at the copper ions,
                                      each of which can associate electrostatically with chloride ions,
                                      causing it to resemble a dandelion ‘clock’ with the central copper
              We need a slightly
                                      ion looking as though it radiates chloride ions. All the ions are
              different form of γ     solvated with water. These interactions are coulombic in nature,
              when working with
                                      so negatively charged chloride anions interact attractively with the
              electrolyte solutions:
              we call it the mean     positive charges of the copper cations. Copper and lithium cations
              ionic activity coefficient  repel. Conversely, the additional Li +  ions attract the negatively
                                                                                      −
              γ ± ,as below.          charged sulphates from the original solution; again, Cl and SO 2−
                                                                                              4
                                      anions repel.
   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350