Page 27 - Pipeline Pigging Technology
P. 27

Pipeline  Pigging  Technology


     brushing would be flushed out in front of the pigs and kept in suspension by
      the turbulent flow. The pipeline would  then be flushed and  swept  out by
     batching pigs until the particulate matter in the flow had reduced to accept-
     able levels. Fig.l  shows typical brush and batching pigs.
        Following brushing, the longer the pipeline the longer it will take to flush
     and sweep out the particles to an acceptable level. Gel slugs are used to pick
     up the debris into suspension, clearing the pipeline more efficiently. Gels are
     specially-formulated viscous liquids which will wet the pipe surface, pick up
     and hold particles in suspension. A slug of gel would be contained  between
     two batching pigs and would be followed by a slug of solvent to remove any
     traces of gel left  behind.

        Flooding for hydrotest


        In order to demonstrate the strength and integrity of the pipeline, it is filled
     with water and pressure tested. The air must be removed so that the line can
     be  pressurized  efficiently  as,  if pockets  of  air  remain, these  will be  com-
     pressed and will absorb energy. It will also take longer to bring the line up to
     pressure and will be more hazardous in the event of a rupture during the test.
     It is therefore necessary to ensure that the line is properly flooded and all the
     air is displaced.
        A  batching pig  driven  ahead  of  the  water  forms  an  efficient  interface.
     Without a pig, in downhill portions  of the line, the water would run  down
     underneath the air trapping pockets  at the high points. Even with a pig, in
     mountainous terrain with steep downhill slopes, the weight of water behind
     the pig can cause it to accelerate away leaving a low pressure zone at the hill
     crest. This would cause dissolved  air to come out of solution and form an air
     lock. A pig with a high pressure drop across it would be required  to prevent
     this.
        Alternatives to using a pig include flushing out the air or installing vents at
     high points. For a long or large-diameter pipeline achieving sufficient flushing
     velocity becomes impractical. Installing vents reduces the pipeline integrity
     and should be avoided. So for flooding a pipeline, pigging is normally the best
     solution.

        Dewatering      and   drying


        After hydrotest the water is generally displaced by air, although sometimes
     nitrogen or the product  are used. The same arguments apply to dewatering
     as applied to flooding. A pig is used to provide an interface between the air

                                        8
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32