Page 79 - Pipeline Pigging Technology
P. 79

Pipeline  Pigging  Technology


         Comments


         (a) It is more difficult to assess whether deposits are present in longer lines
      (over 60km).
        (b) The lines may be dirty either as a result of construction debris or debris
      which has slowly accumulated over many years.
         (c)  Lines that are rapidly accumulating a layer of deposit  require special
      arrangements, i.e. a corrosion-inspection  pig should be run immediately after
      the cleaning programme.
        (d) The normal cleaning runs maintain the flow requirements adequately.
      The corrosion pig, however, introduces a magnetic field into the pipe wall via
      very  strong  permanent  magnets and  brushes.  These  may scrape  off more
      deposits, which may interfere with the sensors'  reading of magnetic signals.
      It is clear that special arrangements have to be made to prevent failure of the
      survey; it is suggested  that  a number  of cleaning  pigs  are  run  at frequent
      intervals, with the results from each run being carefully recorded and studied.
        (e) The formation of so-called 'black dust' (iron sulphate) in gas pipelines
      is caused  by a reaction  between  the  material of the  pipe  wall and  the  gas
      content.  The  dust  is usually very abrasive, wearing  down  discs/cups  at a
      tremendous  rate.  Again,  it  is very  difficult  to  remove  it  from  longer  lines
      (100km and over) due to the wear. Also, the dust may ignite when exposed
      to the air, and so stringent safety precautions are recommended.
        Since the debris is usually concentrated in the most interesting portions of
      the pipeline (the  bottom  of the pipe cross-section,  low spots,  etc.),  lack of
      recorded  data may reduce  the efficiency  of the survey by up to 80%.
        Debris accumulation can result in:

           mechanical failure of the inspection pig, jamming the odometer  wheel
              system (loss of location  reporting);
           lift-off  of the magnetic brushes, and consequent  loss of magnetic field
              (reducing the  level of  detection);
           lift-off  of the  sensors,  and consequent  failure  to detect  magnetic-flux
              leakage (reducing  the  level of  detection);
           accumulation of ferrous debris disturbing the  sensor readings (confus-
              ing the detected  data);
           total or partial destruction  of the corrosion-inspection  pig itself.








                                       60
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84