Page 90 - Pipeline Pigging Technology
P. 90

Pigging for  flexible  pipes


           Steel pipe                        Flexible  pipe

           homogeneous material              inhomogeneous construction
                 construction
           non-layered construction          layered construction
           near-round shape                  slightly oval shape
           monolithic material               composite of materials
           low dynamic fatigue               high dynamic fatigue resistance
                 resistance
           simple structural behaviour       complex structural behaviour
           low flexibility (up to 500 x i.d.)  high flexibility (8-10 x i.d.)
           smooth bore                       smooth or rough bore

      Table  1. Comparison of properties and characteristics for rigid and
                                 flexible pipes.


     outside diameter to form  a durable yet resistant covering capable of taking
     abrasion  forces while  also  resisting  hydrocarbon  fire  (typically  to  Lloyds
      Bulletin at 700°C for 30mins without  loss of content).
        The composite  construction  also serves to reinforce the individual pipe
     components   and  enhance  their  individual strengths.  By embedding  steel
     chords used for axial reinforcement in elastomer matrices, Pag-O-Flex of West
     Germany has found   [Joint Industry Report, 1987]  that  the  breaking load in
     long-term axial pull tests  for embedded  steel chord is considerably  greater
     than that for bare steel chord. This is particularly important when considering
     riser  applications,  where  a catenary configuration is  used  and  combined
     loadings occur  in the steel reinforcement due to internal pressure,  tension,
     and bending  effects.
        Other composites,  such as epoxies,  graphites, and glass fibres,  also  offer
      significant  technical benefits by combining high fibre strength with  good
      material resistance to corrosion or chemical degradation. However, compos-
      ites  [Lefloc'h,1986]  are  often  difficult  to  assess  with  regard  to  structural
      strength and changes in mechanical properties due to the influences of ageing
     and material degradation over time. Certain properties  in material construc-
      tion can lead to a degree of variability in product qualities and a lack of precise
      knowledge  as to which  property  principally governs at any one point in an
     operational  lifetime. Furthermore, distribution  of stresses within individual
     layers  is  not  always  linear  or  simple  to  assess.  It  can  be  said  that  such
     composites  exhibit a complex  rather than  simple structural behaviour,  i.e.
      the material behaves anisotropically (forces do not act in a single direction);
      the construction is inhomogeneous;  and the failure modes can be compound.

                                       71
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95