Page 91 - Pipeline Pigging Technology
P. 91

Pipeline  Pigging  Technology


        In  order  better  to  understand  how  to  inspect  or  make  a  condition
     assessment for flexible pipe, one must first make a comparison between  the
     general properties  and characteristics of flexible pipe with that of steel pipe.
     Some of these differences are illustrated in Table 1  [Neffgen,1988].
        As can be seen from Table  1, considerable differences exist between  rigid
     and flexible pipe. Flexible pipe's complex behaviour in practice means:

           bending moments and strains cannot be easily calculated;
           some component   materials exhibit non-linear behaviour;
           differences  exist  between  component  elastic  moduli which must be
              analytically explained;
           strain distribution around the pipe  is axi-symmetrical.




        DEFECTS AND          MODES       OF FAILURE


        To  understand  the  structure  of  flexible  a  pipe  is  to  appreciate  the
     complexities  of its behaviour  and then  to relate  those  to the presence and
     significance of defects. The purpose  of any inspection  programme is princi-
     pally directed  at  [Bea et al ,OTC,1988]:

           detection  and documentation of defects which can lead to a significant
              reduction  in serviceability characteristics;
           defining what should be inspected,  when, and how;
           establishing a long-term database  and feedback loop;
           establishing the  significance of a defect and/or  the  need  for remedial
              action.

        Such an inspection  programme initially must focus on the identification
     and determination of "...significant defects which can affect  structural capa-
     bility, i.e. the ability of the structure to remain serviceable (not to fail) during
     its projected operational  life"  [Bea etaL, 1988]. The importance  of establish-
     ing  a database  for  pipe  defects  and  understanding  how  such  defects  can
     propagate are important in relating significance with regard to failure  modes.
        Two modes of failure have been  identified as having principal impacts on
     structural  integrity,  those  being  wear  and  fatigue.  Veritec  [Veritec  joint
     industry report, 1987]  has defined wear  as "...the damage to a solid surface
     caused by the removal or displacement of material by the mechanical action
     of  a  contacting  liquid,  solid,  or  gas.  Wear  is  mostly  mechanical,  but  may
     combine with chemical corrosion".

                                       72
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96