Page 155 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 155

61132 Incorrect Operations Index
          open or closed as required) is not correct. A command to open a   ment. These programs can be quite sophisticated in terms ofthe
          valve will not execute if the pressure on either side of the valve   rigor of the data analysis. Use of even rudimentary aspects of
          is not in an acceptable range. Such electronic permissives are   PPM provides at least some evidence to the evaluator that main-
          usually  software  programs  that  may  reside  in  on-site  or   tenance is playing a legitimate role in the company’s risk reduc-
          remotely  located  computers. A computer  is not a  minimum   tion efforts.
          requirement,  however,  because  simple  solenoid  switches or   The evaluator may wish to judge the strength of the mainte-
          wiring arrangements may perform similar functions. The eval-   nance program based on the following items:
          uator  should  assess  the  adequacy  of  such  permissives  to
          perform the intended functions. Furthermore,  they should be   DI. Documentation   2 pts
          regularly tested and calibrated to warrant the maximum point   D2. Schedule   3 pts
           scores.                                    D3. Procedures     IO pts
          Highlighting of critical instruments  This is merely another   D1.  Documentation (0-2  pts)
           method of bringing attention to critical operations. By painting
           a critical valve the color red or by tagging an instrument with a   The evaluator should check for a formal program of retaining
           special designation, the operator will perhaps pause and con-   all paperwork or databases dealing with all aspects of mainte-
           sider his action again. Such pauses to reconsider may well pre-   nance exists. This may include a file system or a computer data-
           vent serious mistakes. Points should be awarded based on how   base in active use. Any serious maintenance effort will have
           effective the evaluator deems the highlighting to be.   associated documentation. The ideal program will constantly
                                                      adjust its maintenance practices based on accurate data collec-
                                                      tion through a formal PPM approach or at least by employing
           D.  Maintenance (suggested weighting:      PPM concepts. Ideally, the data collected during maintenance,
           15%)                                       as well as all maintenance procedures and other documenta-
                                                      tion, will be under a document management system to ensure
           Improper maintenance is a type of error that can occur at sev-   version control and ready access of information.
           eral levels in the operation. Lack of management attention to
           maintenance,  incorrect  maintenance  requirements  or  proce-   DZ.  Schedule (0-3  pts)
           dures, and mistakes made during the actual maintenance activi-
           ties  are all  errors that  may  directly  or  indirectly  lead  to  a   A formal schedule for routine maintenance based on operating
           pipeline failure. The evaluator should again look for a sense of   history, government regulations, and accepted industry prac-
           professionalism,  as well  as a high level of understanding  of   tices will ideally exist. Again, this schedule will ideally reflect
           maintenance requirements for the equipment being used.   actual operating history and, within acceptable guidelines, be
            Note that this item does not command a large share of the   adjusted in response to that history through the use of formal
           risk  assessment  points.  However,  many items in  the overall   PPM procedures or at least the underlying concepts
           pipeline risk assessment are dependent on items in this section.
           A valve or instrument, which due to improper maintenance will   D3.  Procedures (0-10  pts)
           not perform its intended function, negates any risk reduction
           that the device might  have contributed.  If the evaluator has   The evaluator should  verify that  written procedures  dealing
           concerns about proper operator actions in this area, she may   with repairs and routine maintenance are readily available. Not
           need  to adjust  (downward)  all maintenance-dependent  vari-   only should these exist, it should also be clear that they are in
           ables in the overall risk evaluation. Therefore, ifthis item scores   active use by the maintenance personnel. Look for checklists,
           low, it should serve as a trigger to initiate a reevaluation of the   revision  dates,  and  other  evidence  of  their  use.  Procedures
           pipeline.                                  should help to ensure consistency. Specialized procedures are
            Routine maintenance should include procedures and sched-   required to ensure that original design factors are still consid-
           ules for operating valves, inspecting cathodic protection equip-   ered  long after the designers  are gone. A prime  example  is
           ment,  testingcalibrating instrumentation  and safety devices,   welding, where  material  changes  such as hardness,  fracture
           corrosion inspections, painting, component replacement, lubri-   toughness, and corrosion resistance can be seriously affected
           cation of all moving parts,  engine/pump/compressor  mainte-   by the subsequent maintenance activities involving welding.
           nance, tank testing, etc.
            Maintenance  must  also  be  done  in  a  timely  fashion.
           Maintenance  frequency should be consistent with regulatory   Incorrect operations index
           requirements and industry standards as a minimum. Modem
           maintenance practices often revolve around concepts ofpredic-   This is the last of the failure mode indexes in the relative risk
           five preventive  maintenance (PPM)  programs.  In these  pro-   model (see Figure 6.1). This value is combined with the other
           grams,  systematic  collection  and  analyses  of  data  are   indexes discussed in chapters 3 through 6 and then divided by
           emphasized so that maintenance actions are more proactive and   the leak impact factor, which is discussed in Chapter 7, to arrive
           less reactive. Based on statistical analysis of past failures and   at the final risk score. This final risk score is ready to be used in
           the criticality of the equipment, part replacement and mainte-   risk  management  applications  as  discussed  in  Chapter  15.
           nance schedules are developed that optimize the operation-   Chapters 8 through 14 discuss some specialized applications of
           not  wasting  money  on  premature  part  replacement  or   risk techniques. If these are not pertinent to the systems being
           unnecessary  activities,  but  minimizing  downtime  of  equip-   evaluated, the reader can move directly to Chapter 15.
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160