Page 92 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 92

4/70 Corrosion Index
           pipeline  area  foreman. No  formal  specifications  exist.  The   defects exist, and yet, insertion of the pipeline into the casing is
           foreman requests paint work whenever  he  feels it is needed   an easy way to damage the coating and create defects. End seals
           (based on his personal inspection of a facility). The evaluator   are used to keep water, mud, and other possible electrolytes out
           awards points as follows:                  of the casing annular space, but are easily defeated by  poor
                                                      design and/or installation or by minor ground movements. The
           Coating-fair                     2.0 pts   presence of electrolyte in the annular space can lead to corro-
           Application-fair                 1.8       sion cells between the casing and the pipeline, as well as inter-
           Inspection-fair                  2.2       ference problems with  the  cathodic protection system. Vent
           Defect correction-poor           1 .o      pipes are often installed to release leaked products, but these
                                                      vents allow direct communication between the casing annular
           Average                          1.75 pts   space and the atmosphere--consequently, moisture is almost
                                                      always present in the annular space.
            Note: In this example, the evaluator wishes to make distinc-   Cathohc protection is usually employed to protect buried
           tions between the evaluation scores, so she uses decimals to rate   steel pipelines. The casing pipe can shield the pipeline from the
           items a little above or a little below the normal rating. This may   protective currents if there is no electrical bond between the
           be appropriate in some cases, but it adds a level of complexity   casing and the pipeline. If there is such a bond, the casing usu-
           that may not be warranted, given the low point values.   ally not  only shields the pipeline from the current, but  also
             The evaluator feels that  choice of paint is probably appro-   draws current from it, effectively turning the pipeline into an
           priate  though  not  specified.  Application  is  slightly  below   anode that is sacrificed to protect the casing pipe, which is now
           fair because no specifications exist and the contractor’s work-   the cathode!
           force  is  usually  subject to  regular  turnovers.  Inspection is   Several mitigative measures can be employed to reduce cor-
           slightly  above fair because the  foreman does make  specific   rosion problems in casings. These were illustrated earlier in
           inspections for evidence of atmospheric corrosion and is trained   Figure 4.3 and are described below:
           in  spotting this evidence.  Defect correction is poor because
           defect reporting and correction appear to be sporadic at best.   Test leads. By comparing the pipe-to-soil potentials (volt-
                                                        ages) of the pipeline versus the  casing pipe,  evidence of
                                                        bonding between the two is sought. Test leads allow the volt-
           The case fodagainst casings                  age measurements to be made.
                                                        Nonconductive  spacers. These  are  designed  to  keep  the
           Buried casings show up at several points in this risk assess-   pipeline physically and electrically separated from the casing
           ment-sometimes  as risk reducers, sometimes as risk creators.   pipe. They also help to protect the pipe coating during inser-
           The following information provides a general discussion of the   tion into the casing.
           use of pipeline casings.                     End  seals. These are designed to keep  the annular space
             Oversized pipe, called casingpipe, is sometimes placed over   free of substances that can act as an electrolyte (water, mud,
           the carrier pipeline to protect it from external loadings and/or to   etc.).
           facilitate repairs to the carrier pipe. Casings have long been   Filling the annular space. Use of a dielectric (nonconduc-
           used by the pipeline industry. They are generally placed under   tive)  substance reduces  the  potential  for  electrical paths
           highways, roads, and railroads where higher external loadings   between the casing and the pipeline. Unfortunately,  it also
           are anticipated or where pipeline leaks might cause structural   negates some ofthe casing benefits listed earlier.
           damages to a structure (see Figure 4.3 earlier).
             A casing also allows for easier replacement of the pipeline if   Reflecting the  trade-off  in  benefits,  casings  can  be  risk
           a problem should develop. Instead of digging up a roadway, the   reducers (protection from external loads, including third-party
           pipeline can simply be pulled out of the casing, repaired, and   damages and land movements)  yet at the  same time be risk
           reinstalled without disrupting traffic.    adders in the corrosion index (promoting atmospheric and sub-
             A third potential benefit from casings is that a slow pipeline   surface corrosion of metal). It would be nice to say that one
           leak can be contained in the casing and detected via the casing   will always outweigh the other, but we do not know that this is
           vent pipe rather than slowly undermining the roadway or form-   always the case. A risk costhenefit analysis for casings can be
           ing underground pockets of accumulated product.   performed by using a risk model to quantify the relative advan-
             An industry controversy arises because the benefits casings   tages and disadvantages from a risk standpoint.
           provide are at least partially offset by problems caused by their   Other factors must be considered in casing decisions. Often
           presence. These problems are primarily corrosion related. It is   regulatory agencies leave no choice in the matter. The owner of
           probably safe to say that corrosion engineers would rather not   the crossing (railroad, highway, etc.) may also mandate a cer-
           have casings in their systems. It is more difficult to protect an   tain  design. Economics, of course, always play an important
           encased pipe from corrosion. The casing provides an environ-   role. The costs of casings must include ongoing maintenance
           ment in which corrosion can proceed undetected and preven-   costs, but the costs of not using casing must include pipe strong
           tion methods are less effective. Because the pipeline cannot be   enough to carry all loads and damages to the crossing, should
           directly inspected, indirect methods are used to give indications   pipeline replacement be needed.
           of corrosion. These techniques are not comprehensive, some-   As an additional benefit of applying a risk management sys-
           times unreliable, and often require expert interpretation.   tem such as this one to the problem  of casings, the pipeline
             Several  dilemmadproblems  are  typically  encountered   operator and designer have a rational basis for weighing  the
           with casings. Atmospheric corrosion can occur if any coating   benefits of alternate designs.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97