Page 271 - Pipeline Rules of Thumb Handbook
P. 271

258     Pipeline Rules of Thumb Handbook

         Total heating value would then be expressed by the formula:               References

                                                                1. GPA Standard 2145–84, p. 2.
          Btu cf
                =  Btu Dry                                      2. GPA Reference Bulletin, Heating Value As a Basis for
                      cf
            Z                                                      Custody Transfer of Natural Gas (1984 Draft).
                                                                3. AGA Gas Measurement Manual, Section 11A.2 Deter-
         in order to convert Dry Btu to saturated:                 mination of Heating Value of Gas, p. 11A2.1 ff.
                                                                4. Installation and Operation of Recording Calorinators, A.
                                                                   E. Kersey ISHM #64, 1989, p. 93 ff.
                          Btu Dry
          Btu saturated=                                        5. Field Deployable Natural Gas Energy Meter, Lewis and
                       1120 saturation                             Greefield, Sales Information 1989.
                       factor 1.0177)                           6. “Determination of Colorific Values of Natural Gas by
                             (
                                                                   Combustion Instruments,” R. L. Howard, ISHM #64,
           Some process gas chromatographs calculate all the       1989, p. 509.
         above values at a pressure base of 14.696psia only. Others  7. “Fundamentals of Energy Management,” R. L. Howard,
         allow user selection of a different contract pressure base   GCMSC #24, 1989, p. 43.
         and all the constants are then factored by this new pressure  8. “The Therm-titrator, A Comparison With You-Know-
         base.                                                     What,” John Light, GPA #60, 1981.
           Care should be exercised when comparing Btu, SG, and  9. “Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography,”
         others that all these values are calculated at the same   ASTM D1945, p. 133 ff.
         temperature base and pressure base.                   10. “Comparison of Calculated and Measured Heating
                                                                   Values of Natural Gas,” Donald C. Melrose, Appalachian
                                                                   Gas Measurement Short Course, 1975.
                                                               11. “Measuring Gas; Chromatography Bests Calorimetry,”
                             Conclusions                           Leisey, Potter, and McKoy,  Oil and Gas Journal, July
                                                                   1977.
           There are valid reasons for choosing one energy measure-  12. “Sampling and Analysis of Natural Gas,” Schepens,
         ment device over the other. Thermtitrators are fast if control  Kilmer and Bernos, GPA proceedings #61.
         capability is needed. They are not suited for hazardous loca-  13. “Energy Measurement Utilizing On-Line Chro-
         tions and require more rigorous attention to their operational  matographs,” L. N. Cox, Prod. of Inter. School of
         environment. The modern microprocessors used on most      Hydrocarbon Meas. #64, 1989, p. 469 ff.
         chromatographs make them extremely capable in terms of  14. “Btu Measurement in Natural Gas Using Process Gas
         computer interfaces.                                      Chromatography,” Kizer and Sund, Proc. of Gulf Coast
           Chromatographs are suitable for hazardous area installa-  Meas. Soc. #24, 1989, p. 72 ff.
         tions. They are somewhat slower reacting, having six minute  15. “How to Measure Btu Effectively,” Staff, Gas Industries,
         cycle times. However, they generally require less mainte-  August 1989.
         nance than calorimeters even though they seem more tech-  16. “Calculations of Gross Heating Value, Relative Density
         nically complicated. With the AGA-8 supercompressibility  and Compressibility Factor for Natural Gas Mixtures
         calculations, there will most likely be a requirement for a total  from Compositional Analysis,” GPA Std. 2171–86.
         analysis of the gas to do this part of the gas volume calcula-  17. College Chemistry, Bruce H. Mahan, Addison Wesley,
         tions. Thermtitrators cannot do this. GCs that only present  1966, p. 23.
         the flow computer with four analog signals, proportional to  18. “Gas Heating Value: What It Is and How To Measure,
         Btu, SG, CO 2 , and N 2 , may not be much more help.      Calculate,” D. N. McClanahan, Oil and Gas Journal, Feb.
           One company has an interface unit that will pick up and  20, 1967, p. 84 ff.
         store hourly averages of all 12 components from a gas chro-  19. Campbell, “436 Pushes Measurement Into The Elec-
         matograph. These hourly averages can be stored for up to  tronics Age,” American Oil and Gas Report, May 1987,
         three streams for 35 days each so that each hour’s flow in the  p. 15 ff.
         flow computer can be correlated with each hour’s gas com-  20. Hagar, “Pipelines, Producers Cope With Problems Under
         position. This allows composition data for not only MMBtu  FERC Order 436,”  Oil and Gas Journal, May 1987,
         computation, but also AGA-8 volume calculations. From an  p. 17 ff.
         audit standpoint, this allows downstream corrections and   21. Paul, “A Multi Btu Approach to Fuels Procurement,”
         verification that has heretofore not been available.       Nymex Energy in The News, Spring, 1990, p. 4.
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276