Page 266 - Pipeline Rules of Thumb Handbook
P. 266

Gas—General    253

                     CONSIDERATIONS FOR SELECTING ENERGY MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT

           Keeping Track of Gas Heating Value is Important Phase of Today’s Market
           Paul E. Kizer, Applied Automation, Inc., Houston, Texas

             With natural gas energy determination becoming an inte-              General methods
           gral part of the transmission and distribution business in
           today’s market, companies are placing increased emphasis on  First, consider the direct methods of energy determination,
           choosing the correct measuring device. Most current con-  since this is the oldest method in use today. All direct methods
           tracts have a Btu specification and many others use MMBtu  involve the complete oxidation (burning) of gas to determine
           instead of gas volume.                                its energy content. There are two basic classes of direct
             Here is what happens at the burner tip. The following is  measurement devices, calorimeter and thermtitrator.
           the exothermic reaction of methane and oxygen (80 to 95%  Early on, the term representing 100,000Btus was one
           of natural gas):                                      therm of energy. One dekatherm (10 therms) is equal to
                                                                                       21
                                 +
               CH 4 +  20 2 Æ CO 2 +  2 H O Heat (  1010Btu cf ) 1  1,000,000Btu or 1MMBtu. Perhaps this is where the name
                                                                 thermtitrator came from. However, as discussed earlier,
                              2
                                                                       2
           for the case of ethane (up to 3% of natural gas):     MMBtu has supplanted the therm unit of measurement for
                                                                 now.
                                                     1
                                    +
               2C H +  70 2 Æ  4CO +  6H O Heat (1 769Btu cf )     The calorimeter was adapted from a laboratory physical
             2
                6
                                  2
                            2
                                                                 chemistry method called “bomb calorimetry.” These were lab-
           and for the case of propane (usually up to 0.5%, except where  oratory instruments which yield precise results when used
           propane/air peak shaving is used):                    under controlled conditions. However, each determination
                                        (
                                  +
               C H 8 +  50 2 Æ 3 CO 2 +  4 H O Heat 2516Btu cf ) 1  required 4 to 8 hours to complete. This is fine for a research
            3
                                2
                                                                 project, but in a production setting it is easy to see how gas
             Since natural gas is a mixture of these three hydrocarbons  sample cylinders would start piling up. The American
                                                                          3
           plus small amounts of other compounds, these three chemi-  calorimeter provided laboratory type results in less time, but
           cal reactions account for 90 to 99% of the heat generated  the lab conditions had to be tightly controlled with continu-
           when the gas is burned. However, one mole (a mole is a   ally manned equipment. For on-line energy content mea-
                                                 23
           standard number of molecules (6.023  ¥ 10 , Avogadro’s  surement, the Cutler-Hammer Recording Calorimeter stood
                  17
           number)) of propane will generate over twice the heat of  alone for decades. 3,4
                                                      8
                                                   3
           one mole of methane (CH 4 = 1010Btu/cf vrs C H = 2516   While this device still requires rigid environmental condi-
           Btu/cf at 60°F and 414.696psia). A small error in the heavier  tions, it runs unattended for long periods of time (weeks).
           or longer chain hydrocarbon components of natural gas leads  Also it provides a recorder output, which allows the correla-
           to a larger error in the Btu calculation. Consequently, a small  tion of the heating value with the volume of gas. The record-
           shift in the composition of any component can affect the  ing calorimeter’s stated precision is ±5Btu out of 1,000Btus,
           heating value of a cubic foot of carefully measured gas.  although many operators can do better.
             The term MMBtu first came into wide use after the 1978  With the introduction of solid-state electronics, micro
           Natural Gas Policy Act changed the method of custody trans-  calorimetry devices have been tried, but not with much com-
           fer from Mcf to MMBtu. This method was upheld in a court  mercial success. Hart Scientific, Provo, Utah, has used a cat-
           case involving FERC Order 356 (Jan. 1984). 2          alyst bed to perform a controlled isothermal oxidation on a
             How much is it worth to keep track of the Btu? Postulate  very precise volume of gas. Initial results seem to show ±0.5
           a ±5% error between doing a lab determination of the heating  Btu at 1,000Btu precision. 5
           value on a spot sample of gas and on-line (nearly continuous)  The thermtitrator devices utilize a more elegant chemical
           monitor of heating value, which results in a ±50Btu differ-  method, stoichiometry—that is air to gas ratios. One instru-
           ence at a 1,000Btu/cf level. A thousand Btu/cf is fairly average  ment, the PMI thermtitrator, uses the temperature difference
           for natural gas.                                      between two flames to maintain the gas flow ratios at stoi-
             On a station that has 50MMcf/d at $2.50 per Mcf or  chiometric conditions. 6,7
           MMBtu, this is $125,000 worth of gas per day. Five percent  Accuracy is around  ±1Btu at 1,000Btus and compares
                                                                                                    8
           of this is $6,250 per day. If a process chromatograph, $50,000  favorably with the recording calorimeter. The other stoi-
           installed cost, is used to determine the energy content, a  chiometric device is the Honeywell HVT. It uses a zirconium
           payout of less than 10 days is obtained on a 50MMcf/d station.  oxide oxygen sensor to determine stoichiometric conditions
           This explains why most major interconnects have Btu mea-  and automatically adjusts air/gas ratios to minimize excess O.
           surement on-line today.                               Both devices yield rapid reaction to step changes in Btu
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271