Page 243 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 243

216                                                              Chapter 12


           0  Materials and fabrication                                       55%
              Installation                                                    29%
              Commissioning                                                   1%
           0  Insurance and miscellaneous                                     2%

           The cost impact is discussed for each main area.

           Management  and  design:  The  approach  will  have  no  direct  commercial  impact  on  the
           managemenvdesign process. However the design should address all the potential limitations
           of  a 2 medium pipeline to ensure that they are acceptable to the operations phase. One area
           that must be addressed is a system of  assuring that pressure in the line never drops below  a
           prescribed minimum. One approach is to have isolation valves at the ends of the end, which
           are activated on detection of pressure drops as a HIPPS is applied to H P lines;


           Materials  and  fabrication:  The  required  wall-thickness is  significantly  reduced.  Some
           reduction in wall-thickness is achieved for water depths less than  1OOOm. But in water depths
           of 2000rn or more, the reduction is at least 50%;

           Installation:  A  addressed above, for pipelines in  excess  of  2000m  there  is  a  significant
           reduction in lay tension requirements. An added benefit is that lay rates should be faster as the
           wall-thickness of  the pipeline is significantly reduced. It  is envisaged that there will  be no
           adverse commercial impact to this phase.  If  conventional installation methods can be used,
           the cost is reduced further;

           commissioning: As conventional approach of de-watering and drying the pipeline will not be
           possible. However pre-commissioning techniques using  liquids  (methanol) at  the  required
           pressure could be implemented. The approach may have a commercial impact;

           Znsurance etc: Although this is not a well-proven  technique it is technically feasible. It has
           been  used where the pipeline is too light to be  stable on  the seabed, but not  in  ultra deep
           water. Insurance would be related to repair cost rather than risk of damage.

           In  summary,  installation of  a  wet  pipeline  in  lo00 - 3000m water depths is  technically
           feasible and it could reduce the pipeline CAPEX (due to material  savings) by  up  to  27%.
           There is a greater emphasis on the design aspects but with modem analysis methods and tools,
           the engineering can be performed reliably and efficiently.


           12.7  References

            1.  Bai, Y. and Damsleth, P.A. (1997), “Limit State Design of  Offshore Pipelines”, Proc. of
              OMAE’97.
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248