Page 240 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 240

Installation Design                                                   213













                        500    1000    1500   2000   2500    3000
                                      Water Depth (rn)
                              It010 t016 *024“  +036’  I


     Figure 12.30 Installed submerged weight, Pipeline installed flooded.
     When the line is installed empty a direct consequence of the wall-thickness required in deep
     water is the large submerged weight. This becomes  significant when  water depth is deeper
     than lOOOm  where the submerged weight doubles every lOOOm  (Figure 12.29). As would be
     expected, the submerged weights are still lower than having a flooded line - until water depths
     of  circa 2000m are reached.  At 2000m the submerged weight of  a flooded line can be  less
     than an empty line because hydrostatic collapse is not a failure mode.

    Figure  12.30 illustrates  the  associated  pipeline  submerged  weights  for a range  of  pipeline
     diameters when installed wet. The on-bottom stability requirements benefit from the increase
     in the submerged weight due to the heavier wall thickness. This example has not accounted
     for thermal insulation coating that would reduce the submerged weights while still satisfying
     stability requirements.

     12.6.5  S-Lay vs. J-Lay
    The offshore pipeline industry is familiar with experienced in installing air-filled pipelines by
    the  S-Lay  method.  An  indication  of  the  absolute  minimum  lay  tensions  are  illustrated  in
    Figure 12.31, which is generated on the basis that no additional weight coatings are required
    for stability purposes. On the basis that existing spreads have a maximum lay tension capacity
    of between 400 and 500 tones then the deepest a 016” line can be installed is 2000m (Figure
     12.31).


    It is interesting to note that the lay tension in 2000m depth would be the  same (or less) to
    install  the 016” pipeline flooded  as opposed  to dry  (Figure  12.32), but  the  associated cost
    would be less as the required pipe steel would be approximately half of that installing the line
    dry. The difference is even  more dramatic  for a 010” line, which  can be installed  in  over
    3000m of water with existing spreads (when flooded) compared to 2500m when dry.
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245