Page 281 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 281

254                                                               Chapter 14

        Table 14.3 Operating Years Inspection Until the Target Failure Probability.
                          I     I Effect of Inhibitors          I
                          I  PRed.  I   0%  I  SO%  I  60%  I  70%  I  80%  I
                            0%     1      3     4     6      12





                                   8     13     1s    19    23
                            30%    9     15     17    21    29
        14.6.2  Rehabilitation

        A possible major repair alternative is replacement of  a fraction of, or the whole pipeline. The
        major repair/modification can greatly reduce the estimated failure probability. However, as
        the  observed damage can  be  effectively controlled by  the  minor repair/modifications, the
        major modification is not recommended in the requalification process of this pipeline.


        14.7  Conclusions

        The existing criteria for corroded pipelines (ASME B31G) were reviewed. The new criteria
        were developed based on the analmcal, experimental, and numerical studies. Safety factors
        for the new criteria were calibrated using the reliability method. This calibration deliver the
        same safety level implied in the existing B31G criteria. The new criteria were applied in the
        requalification of the existing corroded pipelines.


        14.8  References

        1.  ASME  (1996), “B31G - Manual for Assessing Remaining Strength of  Corroded Pipes”,
           American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
        2.  Bai,  Y.  and  Mgrk,  K.  J.  (1994)  “Probablistic  Assessment  of  Dented  and  Corroded
           Pipeline” International Conference on Offshore and Polar Engineering, Osaka, Japan.
        3.  Bai, Y., Xu, T. and Bea, R., (1997) “Reliability-based Design and Requalification Criteria
           for Longitudinally Corroded Pipes”, ISOPE97.
        4.  BSI (1991) “PD6493 - Guidance on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in
           Fusion Welded Structures”.
        5.  Folias,  E.  S.,  (1965)  “An  Axial  Crack  in  a  Pressurised Cylindrical  Shell”, Int.  J.  of
           Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 1 (l), pp.64-113.
        6.  Galambos, T.V.  (1988) “Guide to Stability Design  Criteria for Metal Structures”, John
           Wiley 8z Sons, Inc. pp. 502-508.
        7.  Hopkins, P. and Jones, D. G.,  (1992) “A Study of the Behaviour of  Long and Complex-
           shaped Corrosion in Transmission Pipelines”, Proceedings of OMAE’92.
        8.  Jones, D. G., Turner T. and Ritchie, D. (1992) “Failure Behaviour of Internally Corroded
           Linepipe”, OMAE’92.
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286