Page 294 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 294

Residual Strength ofDented Pipes with Cracks                          267


                =
             a(.) standard normal distribution function.
        15.4.4  Target Safety Level
        When  carrying  out  structural reliability  analysis,  an  appropriate safety  level  in  a  given
        reference time period and reference length of pipe is required. This should be selected based
        on factors such  as; consequence of  failure, location and contents of  pipes, relevant rules,
        access to inspection and repair, etc. Each factor is termed as target safety levels. Target safety
        levels have to be met in design in order to ensure that certain safety levels are achieved.


        Reliability methods can be applied to verify that the required target safety level is achieved
        for the considered structure. The target safety level for dented pipes with cracks is defined in
        the same level as intact pipe. The target safety level needs to be evaluated considering the
        implied safety level in the existing rules and codes. In the present calibration, however, an
        annual target safety level with  @=3.71 is adopted. To illustrate the effect of  usin  different
        target  safety  levels,  the  annual  target  failure  probability  is  taken  to  be  IO'   or  IO4,
        corresponding to an annual target reliability index of  3.09 or 3.71 respectively in the present
        investigation.  However,  further  considerations  on  the  target  level  should  be  made  in
        connection with actual code implementation.

        15.4.5 Calibration

        The  safety  factor  is  determined  so  that  the  calibrated  reliability  indices  @i  for  various
        conditions are as close to the target safety level PT as possible.
        An optimization procedure should in principle be applied in determining the actual sets of the
        safety factors. In the present case, a trial and error approach is sufficient to find the optimal
        sets of safety factors so that:
             C, fi (P~.~ PT y = minimum                                    (15.36)
                    (y)-

        where:
            fi =  relative frequency of the design case number i
            P?=  target level
            P,, = calibrated probability


        15.5  Design Examples

        Cited from a practical evaluation of an existing dented pipe, an example is given to verify the
        presented model and demonstrate its application in assessing structural integrity of  damaged
        pipes.

        15.5.1  Case Description
        The analysis is based on the following data given in Table 15.2 from an existing pipe.
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299