Page 491 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 491

458                                                              Chapter 24


           Design Procedure and Acceptance Criteria
           The design of bundle system shall ensure that the system satisfies the functional requirements
           and adequate structural integrity is maintained against all the failure modes. In principle, the
           design procedure and acceptance criteria for conventional single pipeline could be applied for
           the bundle system. Some special design considerations are needed, which are presented in this
           section.

           Design Procedure for Bundle System
           The first requirement of the bundle design is to determine the carrier pipe size. Having fixed
           the carrier size the bundle is considered with regard to its on-bottom stability, tow  stresses,
           mechanical protection etc. The recommended design procedure is shown in Figure 24.2.

           The carrier pipe is generally regarded as an installation aid. After installation the carrier pipe
           provides the flowlines with protection from impact. Consideration of  this policy is required
           when carrier pipes contain flowing fluids to provide either a cool down or heat up process, as
           they may be considered as a pipeline.
           Flowlines are usually sized according to processing data. The wall thickness of  the flowlines
           depends on  the  internal pressure containment. However,  in  high  temperature applications
           especially with CRA material thermal loadings must  be considered with regard to flowline
           sizing and more likely material properties that will apply at elevated temperatures.


           The insulation "U" value  will  be  determined from thermal  and  processing analysis. The
           weight and volume of the insulation are needed for bundle design. Thick coatings of polymer
           insulation can result in carrier pipes of  large cross section enclosing relatively small weights
           producing in excess buoyancy. In such cases consideration may have to be given to flooding a
           flowline to provide additional weight.


           Pipe-in-pipe type  insulation  presents  a  good  balance  between  volume  and  weight.  Post
           installation annulus fill insulation does not in itself affect the bundle weight but this type of
           insulation may require pipelines to accommodate expansion or filling requirements.

           The weight of all the bundle component parts must be determined. Generally only carrier pipe
           displacement is considered in the buoyancy calculation. The displacement of externa1 anodes,
           clamps and valves is accounted for by using a submerged weight for these items in the weight
           calculations. The objective of  this weight and  displacement determination is to arrive at  a
           carrier pipe diameter that will provide a resultant buoyancy of  200 N/m  +3%  of  steel pipe
           weight. The 3% figure stems form the weight tolerance and the 200 N/m figure is suited to
           carrier pipe diameters of 32-inch or greater. If  diameters are less than 32-inch then  100 N/m
           should be used. The optimum camer could be found through a reiterative process to calculate
           the weights and buoyancy.


           The  installed  submerged  weight,  expansion  analysis  and  flowline equivalent stresses  are
           considered to ensure that the bundle design will  be stable once installed and has no adverse
           effect on the permanent flowlines.
   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496