Page 393 - Planning and Design of Airports
P. 393

344    Airp o r t  D e sign


                 severe storm occurring very infrequently would undoubtedly cause
                 some damage if the system were designed for a storm of lesser severity.
                 However, if serious interruptions in traffic are not anticipated, a system
                 designed for the larger storm may not be economically justified. Taking
                 these factors into account, the FAA recommends that for civil airports
                 the drainage system be designed for a storm whose probability of occur-
                 rence is once in 5 years [2]. The design should, however, be checked
                 with a storm of lesser frequency (10 to 15 years) to ascertain if serious
                 damage or interruption of traffic would result from such a storm. Drain-
                 age for military airfields is based on a 2-year storm frequency [8].
                    Ordinarily no ponding is permitted on paved surfaces, but in the
                 intervening areas ponding is permitted, provided it will not result in
                 undesirable saturation of the subgrades underneath the pavements.


                 Determining the Intensity-Duration Pattern
                 for the Design Storm
                 The determination of the amount of rainfall which can be expected at
                 the site of the airport is the first step in the design of a drainage sys-
                 tem. Rainfall intensity is expressed in inches per hour for various
                 durations of a particular storm. The expected frequency of occurrence
                 is also an important factor to consider. The severity of storms is
                 related to their frequencies; a storm which is expected to occur once
                 in 100 years will be more severe than one having a frequency of occur-
                 rence of once in 5 years.
                    David L. Yarnell of the U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted
                 extensive investigations concerning rainfall intensities, durations, and fre-
                 quencies throughout the United States [16]. West of the 105th meridian,
                 where the Yarnell information is not as complete, the National Weather
                 Service has compiled rainfall data which appear in Refs. 12 to 14.
                    Yarnell developed rainfall intensities for 5-, 10-, 15-, 30-, 60-, and
                 120-min durations for a storm which can be expected to occur once in
                 5 years and the intensities for a 1-h duration for storms whose expected
                 frequencies of occurrence are once in 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 years.
                 The intensities for a duration of 1 h for frequencies of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50,
                 and 100 years are shown in Fig. 9-1.
                    The 1-h intensity does not by itself portray the intensity-duration
                 pattern of a storm. The Corps of Engineers made extensive studies of
                 rainfall patterns in the United States and found that irrespective of
                 frequency, the intensity-duration patterns of storms were largely
                 governed by their 1-h intensities. That is, two storms of different
                 frequency of occurrence whose 1-h intensities are equal will have
                 similar intensity-duration patterns. This is shown in Fig. 9-2. For
                 example, if the 1-h intensities of storms whose frequencies were 5,
                 10, or 15 years were all exactly 2.0 in/h, the intensity-duration pat-
                 terns would be expected to follow the pattern indicated by the curve
                 labeled 2.0.
   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398